Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br />I I <br /> I <br /> <br />RECEIVE AND REVIEW TELEPHONE SYSTEM QUOTES; <br />SELECT TELEPHONE SYSTEM PROPOSAl, <br /> Klm Moore-Sykes, Assistant City Administrator <br /> <br /> Background: <br /> On September 1, 2000, Staff advised the City Council that the newly hired reception/st <br /> had submitted her resignation after one week of employment with the City. She stated <br /> that she found the telephones outdated and difficult to use. Administrative Services Staff <br /> agreed that the telephone system does not efficiently or adequately handle the large and <br /> increasing volume of telephone calls that the City receives. Staff was directed to solicit <br /> quotes for a new system and $50,000 was approved for.the 2001 City budget. <br /> <br /> Observation: <br /> The City's current vendor was contacted to submit a proposal but to date, they have not <br /> responded. Other telecommun/cation vendors contacted the City and four ultimately <br /> submitted proposals. Staff did not initiate a bidding process because changes to state <br /> bidding laws in 2000 allowed cities to accept quotes for products or services that do not <br /> exceed $50,000. Since all the proposals came in under $40,000, all quotes were accepted. <br /> <br />The Assistant City Administrator met with Administrative Services to find out what <br />features they wanted for a phone system. Other staff members were also asked to <br />complete a survey so that each department's special telephone needs would be reflected <br />in submitted proposals. The Assistant City Adm/nistrator then met individually with <br />each vendor giving them the information contained in this Staff "spec sheet". Each <br />vendor was asked to subm/t a proposal with Staff's specs in mind. Both Assistant City <br />Admirfistrator Moore-Sykes and Kathy Schmitz conducted site visits and demonstrated <br />each of the proposed telephone systems. <br /> <br />Staff also prepared the attached spreadsheet in order to fully evaluate each proposal. <br />They following items were evaluated as part of the spre,adsheet. <br /> ° Completeness of Proposal '" <br /> · Included / Optional items <br /> · Adjustments <br /> Number o f Phones <br /> Required Capabilities <br /> 'Warranties <br /> · Trade-In <br /> <br />The current telephone system is also beginning to require expensive repairs. The voice <br />mail system is crashing and is only being used on a limited basis. Staff is mostly talcing <br />paper messages or using the e-mail system to distribute telephone messages. Central <br />Telephone, the City's current vendor was contacted and a repair technic/an confn-med that <br /> <br />-143- <br /> <br /> <br />