My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:26:11 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:20:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/14/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Approve Contract for Environmental Assessment with ProSource <br />Technologies <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that staff has been in the process of ne <br />professional services with the Coon Rapids firm ProSource Technologies. <br />providing review of the potential environmental impacts from The Ponds <br />assist the Council in deciding whether an Environmental Assessment <br />required for the development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to how long the review <br />cost would be. <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />the estimated <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that he was not <br />could be charged to the developer. <br /> <br />t noted that the cost <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the cost could be' char even when a <br /> development is not on the table. <br /> <br /> City Administrator Norman replie~ ~;~,~,~,s,,..:~ad discussions with >er and he will <br /> be brining back a proposal for Co~'cil:~onsideiri/fi6n:~: ~?ffhas made h that they will be <br /> charged for the Environmental:'~sS~ss~iit. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendfiksen stated that h~r~ceiTod?¢ ?hone ~: m a resident concmed that <br /> the Ci, would not do its impa~ial best ~t?~¥~¢tractor by the Ci <br /> rune with what the Ci¢'~ants and since th~)7~ erson ~at s~oke in hvor of~e Ponds prQect <br /> at the public he'rig ~ t~4~Ci, Adminis~4~ ~that situation is exuberated. <br /> <br /> Gity Adm~iSt~ator. No=an.:~}g"'hed that he als .... ,~:,, p;~i'gke to mat sine resident and offered to let <br /> the resid'en~s work directly:~i~ the consultam~;~?' <br /> C°uncilmembafHend~:&"ih4~l'~&d~:if::~/3:~as acceptable to the resideZ. <br />.=,~.~=~-~::.'~Qi~?Aflministrator N~an replied yes. <br /> Councllmmber ~derson mqmred that since the development was pulled does it negate the <br /> <br /> City AdmimstrafOr No,an replied that the Co~cil is the entiW that makes ~e decision and the <br /> C~W would onlg: be delaying the process ff they don't move fo~ard. He explained that the <br /> :.consultant will.be reviewing the s~e issues as the EAW. <br /> ' :"' <br /> M0{SiOn:':~Y:Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember ~derson, to enter Nto the <br /> a~ment with ProSource Tec~olo~es dated June 21, 2001 for the specific pu¢ose of <br /> ,:;L; ): <br /> <br />City Council/July 10, 2001 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br /> <br />-99- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.