Laserfiche WebLink
RAMSEY HORSE CARE BOARD <br />CITY OF RAaa/ISEY <br /> ANOKA COUNTY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />The Horse Care Board conducted a regular meeting on Wednesday, July 18, 200!., at the Ramsey <br />Municipal Center, 1 $153 Nowthen Blvd. N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Chairperson Roy Shumway <br />Board Member Dorothy Breu <br />Board Member Sharon Niles <br />Board Member Barbara Scottston <br />Board Member Carolyn Shumway <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Chairperson Roy Shumway called the regular meeting of the Horse Care Board to order at 7:03 p.m. <br /> <br />CITIZEN hNI:'UT <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Scottston and seconded by Board Member Niles. to approve the agenda as <br />presented. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson ShumwaY, Board Members Breu, Niles, Scottston, and <br />Shumway. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF HORSE CARE BOARD MINUTES: <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Scottston and seconded by Board Member Niles to approve the April 9, 2001 <br />Horse Care Board meeting minutes with the following correction: <br /> <br />The last sentence on the last page should reference the adjournment of the Horse Care Board, not <br />the Board of Adjustment. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Shumway, Board Members Breu, Niles, Scottston, and <br />Shumway. VotingNo: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />. BOARD BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />Review Proposed Ordinance To Amend Regulations Relating To The Keeping Of <br />Farm Animals, Hoses, and Barns and Stables <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Shumway and seconded by Chairperson Shumway for discussion, to resubmit <br />the proposed ordinance to amend the regulations for keeping, horses as previously proposed by the Horse <br />Care Board, except that the formula for determining the number of horses allowed on parcels exceeding <br />three (3) acres in size should be retained at the current 72 acre per additional horse rather than the <br />proposed increase to 1. acre per additional horse. <br /> <br />-190- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />