Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I existing roadway system. Two accesses are proposed on CR 116. The eastern access onto CR 116 is a public street and appears to be well located. The western access onto CR 116 is proposed to be a private street. This access is not acceptable as proposed. The City has an agreement with Anoka County to limit the number of total (public and private) access points to six between CR 56 (Ramsey Blvd.) and CR 83 (Armstrong Blvd). A second western entrance to this development from CR 116 is permissible, however, it must be extended to the western boundary of the plat so that good public access is available to the parcel to the is proposed onto CR 56, a distance of 420 feet south of 149th Ave. It is in minimize the number of accesses on the County trunk highway recommends that this access be eliminated. Staff suggests that Ave. at the Peridot St, intersection. The development is phases. The townhouse area immediately adjacent to the 100 residential units and the western part and the (See attached drawing showing phasing of project). Management Organization will need to be obtained management activities. City ordinances calls for de-sacs. The concept plan does not show any will be done at the same time as the rezoning and townhomes are proposed as eight-unit reports, site improvements, etc., will be rezoning process. Staff recommended changes outlined in the staff review letter One access lic interest to Therefore, staff to 149th in three with date. all roads except cul- of the townhomes being conducted. The traffic generation the preliminary plat and plan making the Commissioner Kociscak noted that,he would from di~'cussion of this case. Dale Runkle, Director or'and Deve~i~inent for t Keys, gave a bdefhsto, of Bhght Keys Building and Development co,ora;~;n. He ex~!~iged that they presently have a purchase agreement w~th Peter Komscak for-'a:p~7,~of~he prope~ w~ the mmn focus of the project Chai~erson ~i~iT~:uired :if.~e::sketch plan was for the entke parcel or ody the area subject to the pprcMie'ageemgnt';, ~-4::}?~4~,~ ......:; -,,. ,:,.. ,, ,~,,.7~y Co,unity Development :Director Ffblik replied that the sketch plan review applied to the entire site.. -, Mr. Ruble explained that'Bhght Keys has worked with the prope~ owner to develop an overall plan for the skeZ, :'-' Chaicerson Nix~",stated that the prope~y was cu~ently zoned indus~al and inquired if the rezoning would require a major Comprehensive Plan amendment. I I Planning Commission/July 12, 2001 Page 9 of 23 -33-