Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that there have been several comments during the <br />concerning an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW). He advised the <br />what those procedures are. He explained that an EAW can be a mandatory <br />a petition signed by 25 citizens. If the City receives a petition the City <br />all further approvals on the development until the EAW process ~s resol, <br />confirmed the City would be required to hire a firm to conduct the <br />been any formal comment from the Environmental Quality <br />understanding the residents had been petitioning. The th/rd way <br />if the Council determines that. one is necessary. <br /> <br /> on <br /> <br /> stop <br />the p~ is <br /> there <br /> but to <br /> completed <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the residents' <br />agency and then once they make a determination it <br /> <br />before <br /> <br />submitted to a <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes. <br /> <br />Robert Shoberg, 5731 145® Court NW, Ramsey, noted that <br />petition requesting that an EAW be )leted on the site. <br /> <br />submitted a <br /> <br />Sara Stroman 14546 Krypton <br />yesterday and the EQB will <br />signatures were received <br />the residents felt the request was necess ,ary/.~ls <br />to have a mandatory EAW is if the <br />development it is .92~:'~?~ <br /> <br />that the <br /> <br /> EAW was filed <br />to their decision. 85 <br /> explained that the reason <br /> requires a development <br /> one and in the proposed <br /> <br />had considered the potential of <br /> <br /> Jim Bitner,,!'~331 Neon Street, Ramsey, <br /> hazardous waste being on the Site. <br /> <br /> May6~'GameC: replied th~!!:~hen~.,,the was built, they did have'the property <br /> analyzed. ':'"':' ~ ,/';' ¢::; ....... <br /> <br />¢?~Tfifici.~ember ~'on inquired about the se~or build,g: <br /> <br /> Mike Bl~k;: 'Royal Oak~:~;~l;~;}' explained that they had disCussed the idea of minoring the <br /> access site, bh~}never said~h~f:they would be proposing 50 units or the same exact build~g. He <br /> stated that the:2'~te consb~%f 87 acres with 30 of those acres being wetland. He reviewed the <br /> overall densiW2~bSthe site, He explained that the amount of open space, including all geen area, <br /> is 42 percent i~i ~he tow~ome area and the se~or building site has 64 percent of open space. <br /> Mr. Black diG.nOt feel that the development would be a hgh densiW development and thought it <br />';%~e9nt the,~tmtions of the proposed Comprehensive PI~. He stated thru he has worked closely <br /> ~ith:..staff ~s' well as the Council on developing a ggod plan for the CiW of Ramsey and he <br /> th~ t~at the PUD was the appropriate process to complete me development. If the Council <br /> so~Chbbses he can go t~ough each area individually. <br /> <br />City Council/June 26, 2001 <br />Page 15 of 27 <br /> <br />-69- <br /> <br /> <br />