My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:26:11 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:20:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/14/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Goodrich replied that it has been the City's experience that if they don'~t~i~a~'il~ii:? <br /> escrow and they try and revoke the permit it will take several months to do so andSi,~h~"Oourts':'~,?~ <br /> may not require the fence be installed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Karst expressed concern with the amount that is being requested to bees'~;eWed <br /> fence will not cost $73,000. ~'~'i~i:;.'~ii~:i~.< <br /> City Attorney Goodrich replied that the amount can be negotiated;:;i'i'-H~}'reco~nded reducing ~':(?~(;i75,,, <br /> the amount to $50,000. ,:5717':" <br /> Councilmember Anderson inquired if it made more sense!~!~!!,~:evoke the,Conditional Use Permit <br /> that cu~ently exists on ~e prope~ prior to issuing a n~.~¢mit. <br /> CiW Attorney Goodrich replied that in most situations'it wodtd~:'~e~ie to f~voke the existing <br /> Conditional Use Pe~it first, but St. Paul Te~inals has vew csmpt~ reasons for the process to <br /> be handled tNs way and that is why ~41 was added to the te~s of~C0nditiona[Use Pe~it. it <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendfiksen inq~e&~, t:6':~h~;~. Karst anticipated ~3'~g6mening wall beNg <br /> <br /> Mr. Karst replied that once the engneer"e6mpletes..~¢=s g~i-lI~5~-tan the wall and ~ticipates <br /> completion by the spring or June of 2002."' ?:, ~:.:.}-?:?~ <br /> <br /> Gau H~son, B~e Star, Inc., stated that Nss:business. . is adjacent to the prope~. He stated that <br />he has heard, mo~s eat the piece of prope~Se~Cen the two businesses is being acquired for <br />the business~?if that is the ~ he will have ~fi~.'Sf~:~he same concerns as he did with the ACE <br />Solid W~td Transfer station'?He stated that.!he,:Council needs to m~e sure that the prope~ <br />compliks ~ilh ~e pe~ffind~'~notNng b~:~ilpulated that does not confo~ to light industrial <br />prope~y. P~'~tty th~""~S';-~a:-~t6~?~enfing Sauter track traffic onto ~dte Street and <br />Mc~nley Street:-',He"wanted to mak~'~i~re that that ~ck traffic was temporau and if any <br />~/:~d~age.is done to the~eet that would require repair he does not thi~ that he should have pay <br /> <br /> -:.._',-~. ? .' <br /> Ci~ A~ome~Goodfich reco~ended that the Conditional Use Pe~it be amended to require the <br /> screening be completed by'July 1, 2003 and the amount escrowed be set at $50,000. <br /> <br /> Mayor Gamec.:~gested extending the completion date for the screening to September 30, 2002. <br /> <br /> -'-~7~ Consensus b~.~e Council was to require the screeNng to be completed by September o0, 2002. <br /> <br /> M°:{i~h...¢~ Councihnember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember ~derson, to adopt Resolution <br /> ~0t¢0'6- adopting Findings of Fact ¢ relating to St. Paul Te~inals request for a <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br />-76- <br /> <br />City Council/June 26, 2001 <br />Page 22 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.