Laserfiche WebLink
Police Chief Gustafson stated that the City is trying to deny youth access to the <br />emphasized that the City needs to move forward with the ordinance even it is <br />because it is the fight thing to do. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that the Council could look at increasing <br />Council will be reviewing the budget soon. <br /> <br />Police Chief Gustafson stated that he would bring the issue <br />including the cost of the seminars and ways to offset the costs. <br /> <br />ansideration <br /> <br />Case #4: Consider Settlement Agreement with, <br /> <br /> City Administrator Norman stated that the City had a litig~ of a <br /> purchase agreement brought against it by Anoka County Program (ACCAP) <br /> which was initiated on December 27, 2000. The City Council the purchase <br /> agreement of February 18, 1999, their regular meetin 27, 2001. <br /> Complications that resulted from ation caused the City meet in closed <br /> session to discuss the matter the the <br /> upon <br /> Attorney <br /> during the closed session me'~ ~;i~;~.July 5, session, the <br /> settlement agreement is now Pr~'Sented~$~ formal noted that ACCAP <br /> had requested one change to the for one single family <br /> unit group home. <br /> <br /> City Attorney G~i~::~;t:ed that State that a residential property cannot be barred <br /> from beco~g':a"' group ho~¢i!' He stated think that what ACCAP had requested <br /> gave the?:~fi~, ~tdditional... ~:~ ri~. <br /> Courieilmember Kurak 4}. if asking for anything that exceeded the existing <br /> <br /> ..~,~¥:/7'?'~7'Attorney Goo~XTreplied no. <br /> <br /> Counc~lmember Kurak ~nqmred as to why the City has -to stipulate any number of units if <br /> ACCAP will~ib~.require&?~ follow the current zoning. <br /> ~"::::;:~"?? '~5)~le t" t t e 'oe no ned ute <br /> City Attorney GdOdrich repi d ha h City d s t e to stip la any number of units and <br /> noted that und.'~r~'ithe existing zoning the maximum number of units that could be placed on the <br />"~::'i!?:' ::p, roperty is 2.3!~?~ <br /> <br /> ~';~:~;~imciltn~ber Henddksen stated that ACCAP has made statements that have not come true and <br /> theg-lha¥'~' showed that they are willing to sue the City. Because of those reasons the City needs <br /> to/~;ake sure the agreement they sign does not allow for any loop holes. Presently the property is <br /> <br /> City Council/JulY 10, 2001 <br /> Page 7 of 14 <br /> <br />-05- <br /> <br /> <br />