Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #Ol-08-XXX <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING <br />PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR I1V[PROVEMENT PROJECT #01- <br />08 (SEALCOATING OF HEDGEHOG STREET FROM ALPINE DRIVE TO 151sT <br />AVENUE AND 152N~ AVENUE WEST OF CR83) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined with reference to the <br />Alpine Drive to 151st Avenue and 152~a Avenue West of CR83, and the expenses incurred or to <br />be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ so that the total cost of the <br />improvement will be $ <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That the portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Ramsey is <br />hereby declared to be $ and the portion of the cost to be assessed against <br />benefited property owners is declared to be $ <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />That the principal of the assessments shall be in annual installments extending over a <br />period of three years; the first of the installments to be payable on or before December 31, <br />2002, and shall bear interest, per annum, from the date of the adoption of the assessment <br />resolution, at the rate of two (2) percent above the U.S. Treasury Rate. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for <br />such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district <br />affected, without regard to. cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file in the city <br />offices a copy of such proposed assessment for pu~blic inspection. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, <br />notify the Ramsey City Council thereofi <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />-179- <br /> <br /> <br />