Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I ! I I I I I ! I I ! I Motion by Commissioner Sweet and seconded by Vice Chair Kociscak, to recommend Council adopt findings of fact 1 through 12 favorable to the applicant, 13 and 14 the applicant, and 15 and 16 and 17 favorable to the applicant and deny Mr. use permit request, based on the findings of fact. Further discussion: Commissioner Reeve stated"the other direction is that has screen his larger vehicles, and the personal vehicles must be parked on V Another option is to keep the vehicles off-site. Vice Cha/r how neighbors would oppose the building. Twelve hands audience. Commissioner Sweet stated this would set a precedent. Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kociscak, Voting No: Commissioner Johnson. Absent: Chairp, Reeve, and Watson. Case #9: Request for a Conditional Us'e Permit ~; Case of North Suburban Steel Supply Vice Chair Kociscak closed the regul p.m. in order to call the 1: ~ortion of the Planning at 10:28 Commissioner Sweet left .Public Hearing Vice Chair Kociscakcalted the public at 10:307 p.m. Presentation';:, ~?' Co~[~:~'pevelopment,: :~...X~st~t Wald _ ~e Ci, received ~ application ~om Sco~ and Pa~i~ Ja~!uk of 5o~hSub~[~, ....... ,lY, Mc., ~o operate a steel w~ehouse busMess in the accesso~:~mcm~$~&::the.~mP(~:i~ted a 8900 181~t:Avenue. Logy Menard resides at 8940 181~ Ave ~¢:~ently owns ~e:~}cel to ~e west (8900 181~t Avenue). In 1985 L0~y ~r~{:~mgted a 5,000 '~:5~.:~ 100') square foot pole building on ~e p~cel to ~e west wi~out Mso constructing a pnnc~pal~; ~wel~g~ C~ Code states that no accesso~ s~c~e shall be built without tB:e,:p, esence of a p~c~pal structure (dwelling) on ~e prope~. ~s would result in ~e existing accesso~ s~cmr~::¢eing considered~legal non-confo~ing. ~. Men~d has been operating his ~cmral s~$:~l ~d co~erciM fencMg busMess for the p~t fi~een (15) ye~s in the non-confo~% accesso~ building. ~. Men~d is M the process of sell~g the subject prope~ and ~ymg his business to his homestea&.' :As you may recall, in May of 2000 ~. ;~..Ba~e~ app!?d::;for a conditional use pe~it to operate a woodworMng business on ~e prope~ in non-co~0~ing accesso~ structure. ~. Ba~e~ w~ proposMg a 6,000 squ~e foot exp~m~:~employee ~d customer p~g, daily deliveries, and ~mre pl~ for selSstorage uM~:~: ~::}~e Ci~ Council denied the conditional use pemt on May 23, 2000 due in l~ge p~ to the ~Plicants desire for a large exp~sion. State law requires notification to properties wi~n Planning Commission/August 7, 2001 Page 25 of 31 -365-