My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:26:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/28/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
472
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> P.W. CASE <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF CONSIDER EXTENSION OF SOUND WALL <br />ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY #47 <br /> By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the June 18, 2001 Public Works Committee meeting, a petition was received from <br />seven residents of the Amber Ridge subdivision north of Sunwood Drive (149m Avenue) <br />requesting that the road screening wall be extended north of Sunwood to become <br />continuous with the wall in the WilloW Ridge subdivision to the north. <br /> <br />You may recall that the screening wall was not installed in this location because there <br />was no change in the grade of the highway, unlike the section to the south of Sunwood. <br />The cost of the screening wall in areas where there was a sig-nificant grade change was <br />funded 80% with federal grant money as an eli~ble portion of the highway project. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to inquire whether 80% funding might be available on this portion of <br />the project. Attached are copies of my June 27, 2001 letter requesting consideration of <br />funding for the additional wall extension, and the August 3, 2001 response from MnDOT <br />declining this request. <br /> <br />Observation: <br /> <br />The alternative of extending this screening wail vc~uld be financially prohibitive at a cost <br />of over $300,000. This cost could double if residents on the West Side of T.H. #47 also <br />requested a like screening wall. There would also be some technical problems associated <br />with placing a screening wall through the requested area. These problems would be <br />associated with the falling grade from the roadway and drainage flowing from the <br />roadway into the wall. <br /> <br />The petitioners did correctly point out that approxi'mately half of the pre-ex/sting trees, <br />mostly eastern red cedar, were removed as a consequence of the project..Eight trees have <br />been replanted in this area. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br /> <br />Staff recommends that additional trees be pLan~ted in this area to enhance the screening for <br />the affected residences. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />Recommend to City Council that additional trees be planted along the subject area. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Director of Public Works <br />Chief Police <br /> <br />PW: 08/21/01 <br /> <br />-415- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.