My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:26:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/28/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
472
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson expresged concern in regards to the transfer of the property if ACCAP <br />so chooses and what would happen with the TIF District. When she originally discussed the <br />issue with staff she was assured that the TIF would not be transferred if the property owner is <br />transferred, but the new draft of the settlement agreement permits the TIF to be transferred. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that ACCAP had requested that change. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson replied that ifACCAP chooses to sell the property she has no problem <br />with that, but the TIF should not go al'ong with the property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that if ACCAP develops a single family housing project they <br />would have to sell them to individual property owners so therefore the TIF would have to be <br />transferred. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that ACCAP asked for TIF to create an affordable townhome <br />project, but if they sell the property to another property owner then she would not be in favor of <br />using TIF. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that ACCAP would not receive any TIF funds unless the project <br />was constructed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the settlement agreement does not limit the project to a <br />townhome project so ACCAP could construct a number of single family homes, which would <br />then be tax exempt except for the lot tax. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that she would be more comfortable with removing the <br />language "without loss of tax increment financing" from item #4. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that if the City enters into a TIF agreement with ACCAP, they <br />would have to construct the project as agreed to by the ~ity. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that creating the TIF district is taking money away fi.om the <br />existing landowners because they will have to subsidize children from this housing district. It <br />takes a family having a mother and a father both working and asking them to pay more taxes. <br />For that reason he cannot vote in favor of the settlement agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that one of the other options presented to the Council was rezoning <br />the property along T.H. #47 to multi-family residential and since the TIF issue is causing so <br />much concern she suggested that the Council consider rezoning the property which would not <br />cost the City any money. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the rezoning was contrary to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />City Council/July 24, 2001 <br /> Page 9 of 23 <br /> <br />-67- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.