My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/11/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 09/11/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:27:15 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/11/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-52- <br /> <br />stating the trail is closed. The condition would be maintained until the pe~ent railing is in <br />place. As an extra measure of safety, plastic orange construction fencing co~d~,~..~laced_:~.,~. ~ .~ behind <br />the curb, preventing the public from getting within ten feet of the retaining Wall['~az~f(~m~ati~,zely, <br />the City can delay the road opening until the fencing is installed by maintaining th}:~lz~,s.'..'*~, ~r' III <br />barricade across both ends of the project. If the fencing would be authorized through a change <br />order, the fencing could be anticipated to be in place by mid September. If the fencing is to be <br />competitively bid and installed subsequent to an additional contract and additional month can be <br />anticipated over the change order schedule date. Staff recommended that the contractor be <br />directed to open the roadway as soon as final roadway improvements are completed, and that <br />additional signing and construction fencing be installed and maintained until the permanent <br />fencing is in place. Additional costs associated with this measure should be itemized and billed <br />outside the contract. These costs should be paid for by RLK, Inc. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if there were any legal reasons that they should not go <br />ahead with a change order. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied no, along as it fails within the parameters of <br />the contract. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if there is a certain time frame that the road needs to be open. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied no, but noted that staff has received calls from residents <br />inquiring when the road will be opened. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she did not feel comfortable with allowing people to use the <br />road without the fence being in place. If that can be accomplished by mid-September she did not <br />see any reason to open the road any sooner. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he would like to have the road open once everything is completed. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to direct staff to bring to .the next <br />City Council meeting the change order with costs and the proper funding sources so that the road <br />can be completed by the end of September. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec and Councilmembers Kurak, Anderson, and <br />Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he would like some comment from the City Attorney <br />regarding RLK's responsibility. He stated that if the City is hiring an engineering firm to do the <br />engineering and significant things are being missed there is something wrong. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that staff will meet with the City Attorney to <br />discuss the issue and then staff will report back to the Council. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/August 21, 2001 <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.