Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee <br />Date: 01/18/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer <br />Engineering /Public Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Plan for Potential Soil Import to the COR <br />Information <br />Item #: 5. 10. <br />Background: <br />As development of the COR was taking shape, the mass grading activities initiated by the former developer (RTC <br />LLC) were not completed when the project went into foreclosure. As it currently stands the project is <br />approximately 300,000 cubic yards (CY) of material short to complete the original mass grading plan. Whenever <br />City projects are initiated the specifications always require that all excess material will be hauled to the COR for <br />future use as opposed to allowing the contractor to assume ownership. To date thousands of CY have been <br />imported and stockpiled on the site, but we are still a long way away from balancing the project. If we intend to <br />sell property in a "pad ready" condition it would require the City to undertake the mass grading operations of a <br />particular site(s), but if we plan to sell property as is, it would require the developer to evaluate the site and perform <br />whatever improvements are necessary to implement the project. My guess is that we may sell land under both <br />scenarios, depending on the proposal(s) presented. <br />Last year staff reviewed the potential to solve two COR issues (wetland mitigation and a mass grading balance) <br />simultaneously by investigating the opportunity to develop wetland mitigation on some vacant land adjacent to the <br />newly constructed water tower #3 near Elmcrest Park. There currently exists undeveloped land in this location, <br />which was recently platted as ELMCREST SANCTUARY, that has a large wetland complex on portions of the <br />site. The property owner, Oakwood Land Development, inquired whether the City would be interested in acquiring <br />the land, initiating a wetland creation project to enhance and expand the existing wetlands to create banking credits <br />that could be used for the existing COR mitigation permit, and exporting excess soils from the site to the COR. Due <br />to the unknown nature of the constantly evolving COR development this matter was tabled pending quantification <br />of final wetland impacts within the COR, evaluation of how much new wetland could be created on this <br />undeveloped site, and cost considerations for implementing such a potential mitigation option. <br />Oakwood Land Development has decided that there may be a market for wetland credits, and is considering <br />undertaking wetland creation on the ELMCREST SANCTUARY site. They are currently evaluating the process to <br />advance this project to determine whether such wetland creation and banking would be financially feasible. They <br />have submitted the attached letter requesting feedback on the City's level of interest to purchase excess material that <br />will be generated as part of their project. They are requesting that the City consider purchasing approximately <br />50,000 to 80,000 CY of suitable soils for import to the COR at an estimated cost of $6 per CY, which costs would <br />include excavation, trucking, and compaction. If this request seems reasonable and the City chooses to continue <br />the dialogue on this matter there would need to be coordination between Oakwood and the City to determine a <br />desired grading plan that could be implemented through this process. Grading activities would require an Interim <br />Use Permit with the City, independent of any other required permitting on behalf of the developer for their wetland <br />banking creation (LRRWMO/WCA requirements). <br />Other sources of on -site material have been discussed to solve the soil shortage within the COR, including Lake <br />Ramsey, and it is currently unknown how land will be subdivided and developed within the west side of this <br />development so it may be premature to consider such a request at this time. Oakwood is merely trying to guage the <br />City's interest in such a partnership so they can fully evaluate their budget to determine whether their potential <br />mitigation project is financially feasible. Depending on development proposals that come forward in the near <br />future for the COR, the timing may work out for the creation of "pad ready" sites that would fall in line with <br />Oakwood's schedule (tentatively summer of this year). <br />