Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-12- 1) Board of Adjustment public hearing and regular meeting minutes dated August 7, 2001 Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Kociscak, Watson, and Reeves. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Johnson and Sweet. BOARD BUSINESS/PUBLIC HEARiNGS Case #1: Request for a Variance from Street Frontage or Lot Width:Requirements; Case of Kelly Hemp ~: .... Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Board of Adjustme~t:-~eetii/ig-iit.7:09 p.m. in order to conduct the public hearing. _..!~;~: _ ~ Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 7!;09~,p.m. ~'::i%~- Presentation Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that Ke[ly:!Hemp is requesti~g~:a:variance to the minimum lot width or street frontage requirement in ord r::t a a- d~'el.ling may be~:'60nstructed on a tot she would like to purchase from Megan Roche. The su~j.~ct property is"loca[ed 6ri the south side of County Road #64 (181~ Street). The parcel is approxi_matety.:21~::20 acres 'i~.size and is zoned R-IR Rural Residential. The surrounding parcels are also 'zoned 'for single family rural' residential dwellings. Megan Roche owns Parcel A and. B as shown on;the Certificate of Survey. Parcel A has a 66' wide strip of land that has frontage on c0~nty Road #64: 'Parcel B has no direct access to a public road. Even though Parcel. Bis an existingt0t, a home cannot~ . be constructed on the property without a variance. Ms. HemP,.~cho plans to.purchas~t~arcel B:;i:h~s applied for a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement and i; ProPosirtg~at',P~;eI B use Parcel A's access. Parcel B currently has an access easement 'across, Parcel A to enter/exit on to County Road 64, The applicant shall provide pro~t- the. easeh~ent ks recorded with Anoka County. City Staff recommends approval. of the: varian~ikom street frontage and lot width requirements contingent upon the applicant entering into a variance, agreemen~ with the City. CitiZen .Input ~_ Dwighi ~derson owns the'property directly in front of the property in question. He questioned what effect 'this woutdhave on his property or his taxes. He added that from the little information he 'hasreceived, he learned the road or driveway that is there now will be a city road and he asked if that is correct. Principal Planner Trudgeon said this would not impact his property and explained that the road would serve as a driveway to both lots through Parcel A. Board of Adjustment/September 10, 2001 Page 2 of 8 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I