Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-14- Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Kociscak, to adopt Resolution #01-09- 321 adopting Findings of Fact #0572 with variables favorable to the applicant, relating to Kelly Hemp's request for a variance from the street frontage or lot width requirement. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Kociscak, Reeve and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Johnson and Sweet. Motion bv Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Kociscak. to apPr0~e Kelly Hemp's request for a variance from the street frontage or lot width requirement base~: On Findings of Fact and to adopt Resolution #01-09-222 declaring terms of variance. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Kociscak, Reeee,~iiad Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Johnson and Sweet:::/. Case #2: Request for a Variance from Street Fronfa~ge or Lot-Width Requirem/mts; Case of Bruce and Carol Buchart -'.¢'5!:} Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Board of Actj~stment meeting at 7:20 p.m. in order to conduct the public hearing, i' _ ing Public Hear Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to &der at 7:20 p.m. Pres entation Community Development Director Fr01ik stated that Bruce and Carol Buchart are requesting a variance to the minimum lot width or street frontage requirement in order to build a home on a lot they purchased at 8110 I73~a Aven~ie'N':w, .:'AS So~e of the Board members may recall, the Board of AdjustmeF~t approved a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement for this lot on July 7, 1998. However, no building permit was applied for within the one-y.ear time frame and the variance expired '0n.July 7, 1999..-'The owner of the property applied for 'a renewal and the Board of Adjus12nent approved' ii: on Septembe[~ 4, 2000. Again, no building permit was applied for within the one-year time frame:and the variance expired. The property has now been sold to Bruce and CarOl' Buchart and they are prepared to commence construction this year. City Code does not permit the development ora home on a lot that does not meet the minimum width requirements. City Code-deSnes width as the amount of property that abuts the public road. In the rural residential district, the'minimum lot width or street frontage requirement is 200 feet. The subject property abuts County Road #63 at two locations; one measurement is 70 feet and the other is 150 feet. In total, the parcel has 220 feet of non-contiguous street frontage. City Staff recommends re- issuance of the variance from street frontage requirements contingent upon the applicant entering into a variance agreement with the City. The proposed variance is identical to the one approved in 1998 and 2000. Board of Adjustment/September 10, 2001 Page 4 of 8 I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I'