Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I :1 I I I , I I I '1 I I I I I I I I 3. That City Code allows 5,664 square feet of accessory structure space on a 53-acre parcel. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. t6. That the Applicant currentiy maintains 6,454 square feet of accessory structures on the Subject Property which exceeds City Code restrictions by 790 square feet. That an existing 2,470 square foot (38'x 65') accessory structure is deteriorating and needs to be replaced. That the Applicant is proposing to construct a new 3,840 square foot (40' x 96') accessory structure on the property to replace the existing deteriorating building. That the Applicant is proposing to maintain 7,824 square feet of accessory structure space on the Subject Property with the construction of the new 40' x 96' accessory structure. The Subject Property will exceed City Code accessory structure restrictions by 2,160 square feet That the newly constructed detached accessory structure will be utilized for the Applicant's personal storage needs and agricultural purposes, and will also include some storage of agricultural equipment and supplies for Green Valley Green House located across the street from the Subject Property. That the 3,840 square foot accessory structure is subject to the City of Ramsey building permit review process due to potential that person's other than the Permittee may access the contents inside the structure. That the construction of the new detached accessory building will comply with all applicable Uniform Building Codes. That the proposed use will adversely impact traffic in the area. That the pr'op0sed use will' be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market value of' any surrounding property. That the proposed use will be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. That the proposed use will not be served adequately by public facilities and services such as highways and streets. That the proposed use will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and it will be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. RESOLUTION//01-09- Page 3 of 3 -261-