Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I Motion by Commissioner Kociscak, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to recommend that the City Council deny Mr. Wolf's request for a conditional use permit to exceed the accessory structure square footage restrictions established in City Code based on the Findings of Fact with variables favorable to the denial. Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Commissioners Kociscak, Reeve, and Wats ~Voting No: .... Chmrperson N~xt. Absent: Commlss~oners Johnson and Sweet. Case #5: Request to Rezone Certain Property from R-1 Ru~l?::~$~idential to R-1 Urban Residential; Case of Jacob Barthold¢¥and ~lc~ood Land Development, Inc Chmrperson N~xt closed the regular portmn of the Planning ~jmm~ss~on meeting at 8:F5:/p ~. m order to call the public hearing to order. ~:~;:, ~ Pubhc Hearln~ ~,:~ ;.; --.- ~,.~ Chairperson Nixt called the public hearin at 8:15 P r e s e n t a t i o n Community Development Director Frolik stE an application from Jacob and Therese Barthold and Oakwood Land requesting a rezoning of property in Section 14 from R-1 Rural. Resid~"a/to R-1 Residential to permit development of the subject property with sing!e'£~mily ';~Si~ential lot~iii~ed by sanita, ry sewer and municipal water. The property is appro>i~tely 9.7 a~~ in size. A~i~. Barthold s request, the subject property was part of a comPrehensive Pla~i::a~en~dm. ent~ff~d in 1993 by the City of Ramsey for a MUSA boundary eXiS~iion. B~':~h~~'~ hdment was approved b.,y Metro Council in 1995, a porti%n of Mr."Ei~I~ s property, W~h is the subject of today s request, was n,ot included Lri"~'"~':~SA bodnd~?expansion exhibit. The fact that this portion of Mr. Barthold s property is;'n~t''''ii~'~fhe iMUSA:'~e~:~o light during the preliminary plat review of Apple Ridge (ensUing. phases named Pd'ver pih~;)iin 1997. The preliminary plat was modified to eliminate thiS portion of Mr. Bartholg, s propei'ty. Therefore, the current Comprehensive Plan retains this property for single familY:r.&idential uses at rural standards. If the City is inclined to grant the rezoningi', i! would have ~t0ii!be conditioned upon an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan to include the Sub}6ct property in the MUSA boundary. The March 2001 Draf~ comprehenSiX, ePlart proPOses to include the subject property in the next MUSA expansion. City Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Citizen Input John Peterson of Oakwood Land Development, Inc. stated that there is a lot of history on this parcel. His firm is interested in finishing the Apple Ridge/River Pines development. He Planning Commission/September 10, 2001 Page 9 of 24 -27-