Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Gamec replied because he has a commercial operation. <br /> <br />Scott Jarmoluk, stated that they would not be processing any steel and that there~90'~ld be not <br />dumpsters on the site. All material will be brought in, pre-cut. They are simpiy'~,i0'0~g.,for an <br />area to store the steel until the customers are ready for the material. Everything.would b~ b~6ught <br /> ~ . ' ~:,i~ '~:~ <br />in buy a truck and forklifted off. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if there would be any processing on'the sit& <br /> <br />Mr. Jarmoluk replied no, noting that the site will only be used~f0r Storage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she did not have any objection with the, business, but she did <br />not think that the City could start permitting commercial businesses ~n a residential area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman agreed. ' <br /> . ., ~ <br /> <br />Mr. Jarmoluk noted that in front of the parcel there are power lines and. it would be very difficult <br />to build a house on the site. The building wa_s built as a commercial' building with concrete <br />floors and steel trusses.. - · ' ~,~.:;:'.-.. :·' ~- <br /> Patti Jarmoluk stated that there would not be a lot oftm~k t~-affic· .°n the site She stated that the <br /> site would not be appealing for a house and if it is not used for corm'nercial use she did not what <br /> else it could be used for. She stated that the Operat!on would be very quite, and no weekends. <br /> Mayor Gamec stated that if a home was on the property operating the business the use would <br /> probably be permitted, but under these circumstances he did not think they could grant the <br /> permit "-- <br /> <br /> Consensus of the Council' was to amend the'. findings of fact as follows: <br /> <br /> 4 Deleted from the findings of fact. <br /> 11. That the proposed use is likely detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity <br /> of the use, or to the public welfare. <br /> · 12. That ~the proposed usa may adversely impair the use, enjoymem or market value of any <br /> surrounding property.. <br /> · 13. That the proposed-~se will change the essential character of the area. <br /> · 14. That tM proposed use will be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. <br /> · 15. That theproposed use will not be a substantial improvement ~o the property. <br /> · 1 ?. That the proposed use will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br /> public facilities and services of the community, such as fire protection. <br /> · ', 1.8. Deleted from the findings of fact. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Council/August 28, 2001 <br /> Page 28 of 35 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-78- <br /> <br /> <br />