Laserfiche WebLink
In simple terms we have approximately 178 miles of roadway in the City. Taking out 36 miles of MSA roads that <br />have their own funding source leaves 142 miles of local roads, but we are also underfunded with regard to our <br />planned MSA needs. If we were to reconstruct the local roadways every 40 years we would need $142M, or <br />approximately $3.5M annually. If you include sealcoating every 7 years at a price of $25,000/mile and an overlay <br />every 19 years (but only occurs once during the design life) at a price of $105,000/mile we would need another <br />$500,000 and $400,000 respectively, for a total of approximately $4.4M of required funding each year for both <br />maintenance and reconstruction. Currently the only revenue options we have to offset these costs are assessments, <br />MSA, TIF, and the general fund. <br />Other issues that have been discussed with regard to the reconstruction policy include the following: <br />. What is the standard for reconstruction <br />. utilities, cross-sections, trails/sidewalks, load limits, etc. <br />. How to address tax exempt parcels <br />. How to address residents that live on private or County roads <br />. Should it be a flat fee (tax), assessment, or combination <br />. Affects of levy limits and potential bonding as a funding source <br />. Impacts to funding when TIF closes in 2013 ($300,000 reduction in SMP) <br />. A public participation process <br />At the September 21, 2010 Council work session discussions focused on a franchise fee and public participation <br />campaign to educate the residents of the imminent need for roadway improvements, and solicit their feedback on <br />the potential scenarios that exist for a long term sustainable funding source. Staff discussed this matter with Himle <br />Horner, a consultant currently working on marketing for the COR, and requested a proposal to assist the City in <br />completing a public participation program (see attached). Staff is now looking for input on implementation of such <br />a program in an effort to advance this critical infrastructure funding dilemma. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends award of a Contract to Himle Horner for a cost not to exceed $43,000 to assist with the public <br />informational campaign and data gathering to initiate a street reconstruction policy. <br />Funding Source: <br />Since this is an activity that will directly benefit the street system and general state of repair for the street system, <br />it would be appropriate that this money come from the street maintenance account. However, since that account is <br />already being fully utilized for the 2011 Street Maintenance program, it would mean that we would have to <br />eliminate a section of roadway to afford this effort. Staff recommends that this effort be funded from the Public <br />Improvement Revolving fund which has an adequate fund balance and that this amount be reimbursed by the street <br />reconstruction fund when that gets created. <br />Council Action: <br />Based upon discussion <br />Attachments <br />Funding summary <br />Road construction history <br />Himle Horner proposal <br />Form Review <br />Inbox <br />Reviewed By <br />Date <br />Brian Olson <br />Brian Olson <br />0113/2011 01:44PM <br />Diana Lund <br />Diana Lund <br />01/13/2011 02:29 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich <br />Kurt Ulrich <br />01/13/2011 02:56 PM <br />Form Started By: Tim Himmer <br />Started On: 01/13/2011 09:19 AM <br />