My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:28:13 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 3:10:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/09/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:1 <br />,I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />spring where water was almost up to the Parabody building. Staff felt that there was <br />to use Storm Water Utility funds for the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if the Storm Water Utility fund did not <br />they get the funds from to assist with the project. <br /> <br />would <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that that decision would have to be made by <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to where the funds were <br />the Council agreed to contribute the $100,000 towards the proj, <br /> <br />to come from when' <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that he was not sure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if it <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund explained that TIF District 2, which is <br />Business Park 95, is currently in the negative. It will go into the <br /> <br /> the project. <br /> <br />that was used to develop <br />in 2009. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson inquired if th~ <br />through the public hearing process:~: <br /> <br />amend the budget <br /> <br />required to go <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund replied yes. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kurak inquired if would the City being <br /> addressing the problem;:,~ ..... <br /> <br /> City Engineer~i§0n replieG.~t the the problem worse and correcting the <br /> problem w. as,done at the re%nest of the develop~r-i <br /> <br /> Couricilrneinber Hendfi~en.:noted.t~at som~f~he neighbors were us~g the Zitzloff prope~ as <br /> , :;; 2 .: :.: . . <br /> a holding pond:.~d ~e develop~:~;~: e~e~ right to put up b~ers to prevent water ~om <br /> draining on his prOp~. <br /> <br />;¥~5?~"~'6;dh,~mm~r.~ rur~'~t~~ c~, ha~ to be ~e~ o~ how they ~pe~d mo~ey ~o~ the <br />Sto~ Wat~ Utili~ ~nd S'~e.;~ has been ve~ con~oversial. She prefe~ed that 100 percent of <br />the ~nds w0U~8.come ff~' Sto~ Wat~ M~agement ~nd. <br /> "~,77 '~5'~ <br /> <br /> Councilmemb~., ~derson inquired if the Council would be more comfo~able with using bo~ <br /> ~nds, but wit~}~ifferent,~;:.~:;~.~, split. <br /> .~.. ~.;[ <br /> City Eng!ne~;Olson replied that as long as the CiW uses consistency with both ~nds he does not <br /> see~'~,probim. <br /> · :; . ?; .,'- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Finance Committee/September 1I, 2001 <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />-13- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.