Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Zimmerman, <br />and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: Adopt Resolution Approving Proposed 2002 Payable Tax <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund presented the proposed 2002 Payable Tax <br />$4,814,550. She explained that the proposed levy can always be <br />increased without "higher" level approval through an appeals <br />position that the maximum proposed levy be adopted at the <br />must be certified to Anoka County by Monday, September 17 <br /> <br /> the <br />but it <br /> it was <br /> )osed <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember <br />Council adopt Resolution #01-09-~ Approving <br />Tax Levy. <br /> <br />>sed <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />t%~mgommend that the City <br /> ~001, Payable 2002, <br /> <br /> Further discussion: Councilmember Kurak inquired if it was <br /> Mississippi Subdrainage District cannot pay of the cost early. <br /> explaining that it cannot be paid of e~rly because the cost was <br /> Councilmember Kurak inquired if owners were· being <br /> Officer Lund replied yes. if the <br /> more than what the project c0stat'the;:~gd c <br /> that the 444 process was put in <br /> not think they have a problem while <br /> assessment process it can become very <br /> place. Finance Officer. Lund reviewed <br /> Councilmembe~:Z~immerman~stated that in ~i~g of high taxes he does not know how the City <br /> could include'~purcha%i'~ an aerial ladti~:'.i~c[~ Councilmember Hendriksen stated that <br /> when the, C~ty has to add in ·~x~ess of a ½ mtlhqai~lars in aid cuts, the C~ty needs to have some <br /> fiscal restra'mts particularly?bg:?che certificate ~'d~btedness. <br /> <br /> Mobon came&i: ..Vro~mglYes:-:Mayori3~amec, Councflmembers Anderson, and Kurak. Voting <br /> No: Councilmerhb~!3lendriksen and ~ennan. <br /> <br /> Case #3., :~: Review andAdopt Proposed 2002 General Fund Budget <br /> <br /> Finance Offi~er Lund sti~te~:'that the 2002 Proposed General Fund Budget, as it has been <br /> presented, is b~'ed on t~i~'collection of tax dollars at a level that has an imposed levy limit <br /> reenacted for 2002:,,::~ payable. The 2002 budget includes an increase in the staffing complement by <br /> one full-time Associate Planner, one full-time Engineering Tech IV, and increasing the current <br /> Community .S'~ice Officer and Mechanic positions from half time to full time. The budget as <br />'~::!i:i3vesented:in91udes $117,850 of capital outlay items. A small portion of these capital items will <br /> bei funded:from the Equipment Revolving Fund. In total, Public Safety, is now 36.62 percent of <br /> th~'"~budg~t. General Government is 28.51 percent of the budget. Public Works and Parks <br /> ;: ',:.. · <br /> rep?Sent 25.26 percent and miscellaneous and transfers make-up the balance. The 2002 <br /> <br />Finance Committee/September 11, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> property owners in the <br /> Lund replied yes, <br /> ~erty taxes. <br /> Finance <br /> will be paying <br />Hendriksen stated <br />at the top of the hill do <br />swimming. Under the <br />s~ii5¢~ which is why 444 was put in <br />oWners are levied for the project. <br /> <br />-15- <br /> <br /> <br />