Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Hendriksen agreed that the question needs to clearly state that they would be <br /> reducing the requirements to adopt a comprehensive plan. :'" <br /> <br /> Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt <br /> · establishing November 6, 2001, as the special election ate on xfa~ougi-proposed ~a~er <br /> amendments and which resolution also fixes the ballot form as to each election question. <br /> <br /> Further discussion: Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the M~idid no;¢~knt to present <br /> the question in a way that would be easily understood by the v.o~S!t~ May~r.Gamec replied that <br /> he was comfortable with the Charter Commission recommendation,~. . since they gave the issue <br /> significant thought. Alena Hunter, 14628 Helium StreetN~W:; Ramsez,:noted that with the 2002 <br /> election there will be seven members on the Councffso:--.to state that;~the requirement would <br /> change from four votes to three votes would not'~be -accurate. Councitmmnber Zimmerman <br /> replied that a comprehensive plan is' very significant~and should.require more than three out of <br /> five votes Councilmember Hendriksen stated that it should be elearl~, stated that they would be <br /> reducing the requirement from a 4/5ths vote to a simple majar/~ vote. Councilmember <br /> Anderson inquired as to who drafted the questions. City Attorney G0adrich replied that he had. <br /> Councilmember Anderson inquired" 'if they could state that they 5;0i2Id ..be changing the <br /> requirement to a s~mple majority-and .it~urrentiy requires a super majority:Mr. Kieffer stated <br /> that he found it real interesting that when there was an:advisory questioh in 2000 the wording of <br /> the question was not an issue. Councilmember Hendriksen ;repLied:that the question does not <br /> state what the current requirement is and What they wbuld be i~h~ng'ing to. Mr. Kieffer replied <br /> that neither did the advisory question in 2000,,,vhiCh~ad to do~ith turning over the majority of <br /> the Council every~ .tw°. years.~. .. - ." ''~: :~. :': " <br /> <br /> Motion by. COuncilmember Hendriksen, seconded.'by~ Councilmember Zimmerman to amend <br /> -- <br /> Charter Amendment question #3 to clearly state that :they would be reducing the requirement to a <br /> majority vote of all its members as opposed to a.2/3rds vote of all its members. <br /> <br /> Motion carried.~ Voting Ye~: CounCiimembers Hendriksen, Zimmerman, and Anderson. Voting <br /> No: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmemb~:'Kurak. <br /> <br /> 'original Motion carrie& Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Anderson, <br /> Hendriksen, and Zimmerman...Voting No: None. <br /> <br /> Case #9: Consider Advisory Election Question for November 6, 2001 Special Election <br /> <br />': :: City Administrator Norman stated that during the September 6, 2001 meeting of the Charter <br />..: Commission; .thee Commission recommended the City Council include an advisory election <br />question on the November 6, 2001 ballot. The question being recommended to the City Council <br />invoives the 2000 advisory question, which posed a preference request for a majority City <br />Council turnover every two years. The advisory question was rewritten to include language <br />reducing the Mayor's term from four years back to two years prior to its recommendation to the <br /> <br /> -34- <br /> <br />City Council/September 11, 2001 <br /> Page 16 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />