Laserfiche WebLink
Case//5: <br /> <br />Request for Final Plat Approval of McDonald 2"~ Addition; <br />McDonald <br /> <br />Case of Rdbert <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that Robert McDonald ~s requesting' final plat <br />approval to create two new lots from an existing 38- acre homestead and a*5-acre h6mestead <br />located at 16641 Variolite Street and 16591 Variolite Street. Mr. McDon~t.d currenti~'~i°wns <br />~8.2_ acres and Mr. Makowsky owns 5.38-acres (for a total of 43.60 acr~s)::and they would'~h~b <br />to subdivide their parcels to create two more lots that will consist of~2:5 acres:.and 3 acres. <br />minor subdivision is in conformance with 4 units in 40 acr, e~:'.'density restrictions. The <br />development agreement prohibits any future subdivision of..'!l~e prop~ until the 4 in 40 <br />restriction is repealed or reduced, or city sewer and water m.~.aeailhble to the property. The newly <br />created and existing lots meet the 200 feet of frontage or~ alpublic road requirement. The subject <br />property is located within the Rural Transition Area andi.s subject to a minimum 2.5 acre lot size <br />restriction, the newly created and existing lots meet the. lot size requirement. The standard <br />drainage and utility easements are provided along the perimeter of each of th~ lots and over the <br />wetlands. In 1992 when Mr. McDonald subdivided his land intO: 'the existing two homesteads, <br />staff made a recommendation that if future lots were ever created they Would be required to share <br />an access onto Var/olite Street. Follow/rig previous and current pracffee':to limii~ ~e number of <br />accesses onto Variolite Street, staff recommended that the two newly:'cr~ated lots provide a <br />shared access onto Variolite Stre~f.' Staff'alS6~r, ecommended that the disveWays for the newly <br />created tots be aligned on the lots to all°~ for futUi~e'subdivision and ultimately access be derived <br />from an interior road and access'be eli~ated from variolit~' Street.' ;The plat is retaining a 66- <br />foot drainage and utility easement throUgh .the platen an east/west direction. The easement is <br />intended to preserve a corridor for a futur~'r°ad! that' is desi~hted in the comprehensive plan to <br />facilitate the future' extension of 167th Avenue to Armstrong Blvd. At their September 10, 2001 <br />meeting, the Planning commission reviewed~'the proposed subdivision and recommended that <br />the applicant Proceed to final plat stage. Cia';Staff'.and the Planning Commission recommend <br />approval of.the final plat of McDonald Second Addition. <br /> <br />Councitmember Kurak inquired kf tln_e dra/n~b and utility easement staff is talldng about was <br /> wetlan& . <br />entirely all .... - ....... :~'~:-~.: <br /> <br />Robert McDonald, 16641 Variolite Street, Ramsey, replied not in his opinion. He explained that <br />the area. fdentified by the Surveyor xs a ditch, and the other side of the ditch are fields that are <br />used for agriculture. The landis not identified as a wetland, but is identified as a flood plain. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if Mr. McDonald used the property for farming. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald-'rePlied yes, explaining that the land is currently being hayed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak required as to how the easement would impact Mr. McDonalds's ability <br />to.use the :property. <br /> <br />-30- <br /> <br />City Council/September 25, 2001 <br /> Page 16 of 31 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />