My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:28:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 3:22:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/23/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Counoilmember Zimmerman replied yes, explaining that it currently drains into Trott BrOo!~: <br /> main concern is that they treat all applicants the same. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what they have done in the past. :.w~t~::- <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Frolik replied that the City has encum;l~er, ed wetlands:~th. <br /> drainage and utility easement. ;.-t.,f~i}. ...... <br /> Councilmember Kurak inquired as to what the purpose for en~U'~be~r~g:'all wetlands with a <br /> drainage and utility easement. ~ .... <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Frolik replied that-iris :.done to prevent any structures from <br /> being constructed in an area that would not be approved f0r:~tevelopment.:. :.:,. 7' <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kurak stated that she could not agree to encumbering someone's property <br /> unnecessarily <br /> <br /> Councilmember Zimmerman stated.that as part of plat approval staffiiaS'~o"identify where <br /> wetlands are, what they do with that land is a.:different storv. .:' ,.' <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kurak replie~iCthat wlsen-,there is a d~rainage '8ase~ent on a property the City <br /> could drain as much water on to the property as they'want. It is~ Ie~ality issue. The City would <br /> already be receiving a 50-foot ditch so she'feels theCity would_be stepping over the boundary by <br /> taking the entire wetland, ~, <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen replied that it has been.dbne in the past. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kurak statedthat just because they have done it in the past does not make it <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendi4ksen replied tha¥ ~-~rhaps the policy should be reviewed. <br /> <br /> ,. t-'.. '~8~ncilmember Anderson stated' that having a wetland delineation is probably the answer for <br />- - this case. - <br /> <br /> City Attorney 'Goodrich inquired if the City was willing to pay for the wetland delineation. <br /> <br /> Mayor GamecTeplied that in most cases the developer pays the cost. <br /> <br /> -':Oity Attorney Goodrich recommended tabling action until the developer provides the appropriate <br /> w, etland'-delineation to the City. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-32- <br /> <br />City Council/September 25, 2001 <br /> Page 18 of 31 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.