Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mayor Gamec called the regular meeting of the City Council to order at 9:25 p.m. Case #7: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Maintain Two Parcel; Case of Don and Nancy Young Community Development Director Frolik stated that City Code than one main dwelling on a lot unless other,vise provided for Young reside at 6421 154th Lane and they are requesting a second dwelling on their property to provide living living quarters for Mrs. Young's mother. The Subject P is and is located in the Rural Residential Area. Mr. foot (24' x 24') detached garage that serves as construct another two story 960 square foot (24' x 38') structure would serve two purposes for the Youngs; they not be and to maintain a they and immediate -' 1.3 acres in size g 576 square would like to proposed accessory store personal recreational items on the first floor and utilize the second floor as a liv~g quarters for themselves and immediate living quarters for Mrs. Young's mother. ~i~'~d.~'~¥oung do not intend to rent or lease the dwelling large. Ctty Code allows of 1,664 squ~e feet of accesso~ structures on ~e proposed .aee~so~ s~cmre ~d meets ~Gi~ Code requirements. existing detached garage The conditional use permit request structure for a secondary dwelling on accessory structure and use it for t permit process. Thelsubj.ect property is applicants wo~d;be T~qii~d to install a se dwelling and:.:~fore a d~i~ination as to floor to the accessory like to construct the be subject to the building by an oni~lte septic and well system. The septic system to service the proposed second another septic system can be located on the property will need ~/5'ke made by a lector. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agencyreqmres that for each. septic system -.~. on a prope~, ~ alternate location must be determed m 'ease of a .sep~c. system fml~n t~s case, ~o alternate septic system locations or one altemate~:s!t~.:~that:'~6~deS~(s~eht capacl~ for ~o dwelhng umts will need to be dete~ined on tBe. Sub~ect prope~. ~en the Ci~ Council reviewed previous requests for ~nd~ttonal use pe~i~::to maintain ~o dwellings on a parcel, it was stated that requests for ~o I ~ prope~Should~:}'be viewed as a me~s to remedy a unique or already existing September 10~}~001 to ~9iew the conditional use pe~it request and held a public heahng. There was no ~!~Zen input during the public he~g. ~e Pl~ng Co~ission reco~ended denial of the ~3itional use pe~it request b~ed on the direction the CiW Council has ~ven ~ :the past reg~d~g new construction of second dwellings on a p~cel. MaYor.Gamec stated that Wpically second dwellings have not been pe~2ed in the CiW. He expIaiged that there were a couple of situations where second dwellings were pe~ed where a s~c~re already cu~ently existed on the prop~y. City Council/September 25, 2001 Page 23 of 31 -37-