My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/03/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/03/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:05:19 AM
Creation date
1/28/2011 4:51:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/03/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 25, 2010 I Volume 4 I No. 24 Zoning Bulletin <br />the neighborhood and the zoning uses of nearby properties. Factor 4 <br />was met in that the city required the nine -foot wall for noise abate- <br />ment, and the city found it "had no way to address the other issues <br />of EMFs and stray voltage." Factor 6 was met as meeting minutes <br />revealed that city commissioners "considered and recognized the gain <br />to the public [i.e., meeting increased electrical needs] versus the hard- <br />ship on the individual property holders [i.e., increased noise on the <br />Evans' property]." Factor 7 was met as the planning commission rec- <br />ommended the city grant the CUP. <br />Having found these factors were considered by the city in granting <br />the CUP to Westar, the court concluded that the city's decision was <br />"reasonable "; it was "not so wide of the mark that it 1[ay] outside <br />the realm of fair debate." <br />See also: Golden v. City of Overland Park, 224 Kan. 591, 584 P.2d <br />130 (1978). <br />See also: McPherson Landfill, Inc. v. Board of County Com'rs of <br />Shawnee County, 274 Kan. 303, 49 P.3d 522 (2002). <br />Case Note: As the court noted in its decision: "No one wants <br />to have an electrical substation for a neighbor, but the city <br />commission had to balance all the interests involved, including <br />Westar's, the Evans' and other neighbors', and the community <br />as a whole." The court found it was "reasonable for the [c]ity <br />to plan for the increasing electrical needs of the community" <br />and reasonable to make the restrictions it did in granting We- <br />star's CUP. <br />Zoning News from Around the Nation <br />FLORIDA <br />The Third District Court of Appeals recently "upheld the consti- <br />tutionality of the City of Coral Gables Zoning Code pertaining to <br />trucks parked in residential and commercial areas." The city's zon- <br />ing law "prohibits the parking of trucks in residential areas unless <br />parked in an enclosed garage. It also prohibits the parking of trucks, <br />trailers, commercial or recreational vehicles upon the streets or other <br />public places in the City between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 <br />a.m. of the following day." Reportedly, the city's code enforcement <br />officers will now begin issuing warning notices for the overnight <br />10 © 2010 Thomson Reuters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.