Laserfiche WebLink
LOCAL C~OVERN]VIENT STRUCTIJ1LE AND ORGANfZATION <br />PA¢~ 18 <br /> <br />DISADVANTAGES OF A WARD SYSTEM <br /> <br />Ward boundaries don't necessarily delineate a homogeneous area. Thus, there may <br />not be a ward interest that justifies separate representation.' , : .~. <br /> <br />A voter in one ward may favor a candidate in another ward, so the ward system <br />prevents the voter from fully exercising his or her freedom of choice. <br /> <br />The ward system may result in unequal representation. Even if the system 'is not <br />gerrymandered (drawing illogical boundaries), natural population shifts may soon <br />render the wards unequal in numbers. <br /> <br />Once established, ward boundaries are difficult to change. Redistricting may be <br />expensive .... <br /> <br />The ward system encourages a spirit of Iocalness. The basis of council selection <br />tends to be service to the ward, not to the city. A councilmember is more likely to <br />represent private interests rather than the interests of the city. <br /> <br />In some wards, there may be a difficulty in finding qualified candidates who are <br />willing to run for office. <br /> <br />Politically active or special ip. terest groups may be over repres, ented by targeting <br />certain wards. <br /> <br />Elections will be more expensive as more polling places and election judges will be <br />needed. It may more difficult for voter to find the correct polling place. <br /> <br />Wards may foster a divisive competition for scarce resources. <br /> <br /> <br />