Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoptio~?. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #03-09-X~.X <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING <br />PREPAIL4T1ON OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #03- <br />02 (SEALCOAT AND CRACKFILL NORTH FORTY 3r~r~ ADDITION) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined with reference to the <br />North Forty 3rd Addition, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the m -aking of such <br /> 0.~ .~ n74 <br />improvement amount to $12,074 so that the total cost of the improvement will be ,l:,v . <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANO}Czk COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That the portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Ramsey is <br />hereby declared to be. $6,037 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against beneiked <br />property owners is declared to be $6.037. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />That the principal of the assessments shall be 'in annual installments extending over a <br />period of three years; the first of the installments to be payable on or before December 31, <br />~00~, and shall bear interest, per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment <br />resolution, at the rate of two (2) percent above the U.S. Treasu~ Rate. <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for <br />such improvement against eyeD, assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district <br />affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file in the city <br />offices a copy of such proposed assessment for public inspection. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, <br />notify the Ramsey City Council thereof. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing re~olution Was duly seconded by councilmember, <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following vOted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />-147- <br /> <br /> <br />