My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/09/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 09/09/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:53:19 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 7:49:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/09/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Oamec, and Councilmembers Pearson, Strommen, Cook, <br />Elvig, Kurak, and Zin~merman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The public heating closed at 9:02 p.m. <br /> <br />Council Action <br /> <br />The regular meeting of the City Council was called back to order at 7:02 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if she was mistaken that the people impacted by the Fluorine <br />Street project were more concerned about the cmmection of the road rather than the street being <br />paved. <br /> <br />The residents responded that was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she would agee with keeping the road a cut-de-sac. Ms. <br />Kurak inquired on the Pondvale project was the sewer line coming from the north and did the <br />project rely on the Helium Street project. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied no. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she could a~'ee -with not cmmecting the streets and then taking <br />the easements necessa~ to put the pipes under~ound and then wait until the future development <br />of the property. That would take care of the Pondvale issue, but still have the availability of <br />sewer and water. She inquired if-the Pondvale development was mostly concerned about road <br />connectivity. <br /> <br />The residents replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that if the cul-de-sac issue is the only thing from keeping the <br />project from moving fm~,ard she would go ahead with the cul-de-sac if the rest of the project can <br />proceed forward. The other area of concern would be if the fire department could turn their <br />trucks around in the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Ms. Stamen inquired if there was a general size requirement for the construction of a cul-de-sac <br />and if the cul-de-sac needs to be increased in size couldn't that be done since the residents are <br />willing to give their property, for the cuI-des-ac~ <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied that that is something that could be done. <br /> <br />Ms. Stamen inquired if it was feasible that the staff would cOme back to them with another plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that staff cannot do anything without the direction of the City Council. <br /> <br />-64- <br /> <br />Ci~, Council/August 12, 2003 <br /> Page 16 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.