Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />Councilmember <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECEIVING <br />IMPROVEMENT PROJECT <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION #00-01- <br /> <br /> REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON <br /> #99-12 (BITUMINOUS PAVING OF IGUANA STREET <br /> <br />FROM 153m~ AVENUE TO 151sT LANE) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution #00-00-XXX adopted by Ramsey City Council on <br />January 1 i, 2000, a report has been prepared by Steve Jankowski, City Engineer, with reference <br />to Improvement Project #99-12 (Bituminous Paving of Iguana Street from 153rd Avenue to 151st <br />Lane); and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the report was received by the Ramsey City Council on January t 1, 2000, <br />which indicates the following: <br /> <br />Estimated total cost of the project <br /> <br />Estimated total assessment <br /> <br />Estimated assessment per unit <br />(10 year term) <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That the Ramsey City Council will consider the improvement of bituminous paving of <br />Iguana Street from 153rd Avenue to 151st Lane in accordance with the report and the <br />assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant <br />to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and Ramsey City Code Section 4.60 at an estimated cost <br />of $ <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />That a public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 8th day of <br />February, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the Ramsey Municipal Center at 7:00 p.m., and <br />the City Administrator shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and <br />improvement as required by law. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br /> <br />