My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/11/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 01/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:38:02 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 9:10:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/11/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Jankowski stated that in order to charge a fee for the placement of items within the <br />right-of-way, there would have to be a franchise ordinance. The proposed ordinance would <br />allow for a fee requiring the company to maintain what is installed within the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the proposed ordinance is the ordinance he presented to <br />the City Attorney. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that he believes it is the same ordinance, but would have to <br />verify to make sure. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that the proposed ordinance is the same model ordinance <br />that has been passed around through other organizations. The ordinance was started from a <br />lawsuit within the City of Redwood Falls. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly stated that with all of the telecommunications and deregulation taking <br />place the ordinance should include wording in regards to removal otherwise the City could end <br />up with a fight-of-way full of"junk". <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he would like to see a franchise fee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he would like to hear the pros and cons of a franchise fee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly stated that the City needs to have documentation of what is in the <br />right-of-way and how the items will be removed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman suggested exploring the idea of a franchise fee in addition to <br />introducing the right-of-way ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly questioned if the issue of removal should be included within the right- <br />of-way ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that if a company spends millions of dollars on placing <br />materials within a right-of-way and then the company goes bankrupt there will be no money to <br />remove the materials. He questioned if the City should require a bond to guarantee removal if <br />needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman questioned if another company comes in and damages another <br />companies property that is installed within the right-of-way can the City be sued. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the v[,ording that is stated within the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen requested that Staff track down the ordinance he gave to the City <br />Attorney to verify it is the same ordinance. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/November 16, I999 <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.