Laserfiche WebLink
would recommend access from 177th Avenue. The Planning Commission has forwarded <br />findings of fact for Council consideration and recommended denial of the application. Staff <br />recommends amending the proposed findings by the addition of the following statement: a) That <br />the Applicant's proposal for a 180 foot high tower is equal to 240% of the 75 foot height limit <br />established in the Residential district, and the applicant has not provided evidence to support that <br />the surrounding topography, structures, vegetation and other factors make the height limit for a <br />complying tower impractical; b) That a transmittal fi.om Mn/DOT dated January 4, 2000, <br />indicates that an access permit from Highway #47 for cell tower maintenance purposes will be <br />denied for safety reasons. The Planning Commission also stated a desire to revisit the tower <br />ordinance, especially that section pertaining to cell towers in residential districts. Council may <br />want to consider adopting a moratorium on tower applications in residential districts to allow <br />time to study the issue. If Council denies the U.S. West application but is agreeable to <br />considering an alternate location, then the moratorium should not be established, but high <br />priority should be given to reviewing the existing ordinance for any amendments deemed <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Kristina Bocian, representing U.S. West, stated they have updated their plans since the Planning <br />Commission meeting and have new drawings. She noted they have added landscaping, fencing, <br />and changed the access from Highway #47 to 177th Avenue, as recommended. Ms. Bocian <br />explained that they have a gap in coverage so they issued a search ring where they need to locate <br />antennas. She stated they typically look for a co-location situation but if that option is not <br />available, they are forced to construct a tower and need this height. She stated they approached <br />the Planning staff and asked for direction, and this property was targeted because it was a large <br />parcel and they felt more suitable for a tower. Ms. Bocian stated the tower can accommodate a <br />total of four carders. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen asked if the design of the tower is such that if it were to collapse it, <br />would collapse on itself. <br /> <br />Ms. Bocian stated that is correct, it would bend in half and collapse on itself, or one-half the <br />height of the tower which is 90 feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen asked if there is a structure within a 90-foot radius of the tower and <br />if 90 feet would be the area needed. <br /> <br />Ms. Boshan stated this tower site is about 120 feet from the eastern property line and that 90 feet <br />would be an appropriate area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen asked how the restriction was determined in the ordinance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated a planning intern drafted the ordinance based on <br />a model ordinance and considered the restriction since this is a residential area. <br /> <br />City Council/January 25, 2000 <br /> Page 16 of 34 <br /> <br /> <br />