My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:39:15 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 9:52:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Frolik clarified that U.S. West is not amending their height <br />request but only showing the number of additional towers that would be required if they reduced <br />the tower height to 75 feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Mitchel noted the City hired an independent consultant who reviewed the plans and provided <br />his recommendation of a positive nature to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Bob Longfield, 5751 177th Avenue NW, Ramsey, asked why a tower is needed in this <br />neighborhood. He stated the City's boundary is only one-half a mile away and asked why an <br />existing tower is not being considered instead. Mr. Longfield stated the proposed tower area <br />could be developed in several years and a tower would restrict that development and the location <br />of roads. He noted this will be a main development and there are churches to the north and south <br />that have plenty of property. He stated there is also a tower by LeTourneau and suggested that <br />site be considered. He stated it is ridiculous to even consider this location. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly stated that is why she supports a review by the Planning Commission <br />on how the ordinance should be written. <br /> <br />Mr. Longfield stated his support to stop this project, identify appropriate locations, and then <br />work with them in a partnership. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated consideration could be extended to April 16, 2000 or a <br />moratorium considered that would extend to about that same time period. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson asked if the Community Development Director's department requests <br />the extension. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated she would notify the applicant in writing that <br />the City is going to evoke its right for a 90-day extension. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson noted that during the extension, a moratorium could also be <br />considered if.it became obvious that a deadline of April 16 was not going to work. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that while that option may exist, he would recommend it be used <br />guardedly and restrictively. <br /> <br />John Enstrom, 8702 181~t Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that he did not know this meeting was <br />going to be held tonight on the tower but he wanted to mention that Tony Bocian discussed <br />building a tower on his property using one of the NSP transmission towers. He stated that he <br />believed it had merit to locate on his property since there is an existing tower and roadway. He <br />stated that tower is the tallest tower NSP owns in the right-of-way and while he does not look <br />forward to having it, maybe the City should look at it. Mr. Enstrom stated he wanted to talk with <br />staff about the zoning and requirements for building in the future. He stated his support to have <br />these issues further researched so the ordinance is written correctly. <br /> <br />City Council/January 25, 2000 <br /> Page 19 of 34 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.