My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:39:15 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 9:52:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Administrator Norman stated that Council had directed staffto investigate the possibility of <br />constructing a pedestrian crossing at the intersection of 143rd Avenue. Council also directed staff <br />to determine the availability of financial assistance from MnDOT for such a project. The design <br />consultant has informed staff that in order to request the pedestrian crossing, project development <br />reports would need to be revised because this would be a major project change, and it is <br />estimated that this would set the project back six to eight months. Because of the delay, the <br />project would lose the additional federal funding which has been made available to the City. <br /> <br />Jim ?, SRF, reviewed a possible pedestrian crossing at the142~d intersection, explaining that <br />in order to construct the crossing there would need to be 300 feet of ramp to get to the top of the <br />bridge since the terrain in the area is off. His recommendation was to not construct a pedestrian <br />crossing in this location and noted that the cost to complete the project would range from <br />$600,000 - $650,000. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski inquired if the crossing would require additional right-of-way. <br /> <br />Jim ? replied that the crossing could be constructed within the existing fight-of-way. He also <br />noted that if the City were to construct the crossing along with the T.H.//47 improvements the <br />project would be delayed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly inquired if SRF would have any other recommendations. <br /> <br />Jim ?, replied that the issue is how to move pedestrians across the roadway. Signalization would <br />help the situation or widening the median approximately ten feet would make a pedestrian feel <br />more comfortable with crossing the roadway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly inquired if there would be enough space to widen the median. <br /> <br />Jim ? replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if widening the median would delay the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Iler replied yes. He suggested it would be more appropriate to construct a pedestrian <br />crossing connecting to a trail rather than an intersection. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to not proceed with the pedestrian crossing. <br /> <br />3) County Finance Commitment <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that Anoka County had decreased their commitment from <br />$250,000 to $50,000 at the time the Federal financial commitment increased. City <br />Councilmembers expressed concern of the decrease to County Commissioner Dennis Berg and <br />County Engineer Jon Olson, and the matter was reconsidered. Staff has now received formal <br />notification from the County that the County cost participation will total the amount of $250,000 <br /> <br />City Council/February 8, 2000 <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I' <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.