Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br /> CASE #: ~ <br /> <br /> PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND SIZE LIMITS ON ATTACHED GARAGES <br /> By: Community Development Director Sylvia Frolik . <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The last time City Code regulations' regarding garages and accessory buildings were amended <br />(1999), City Staff decided to include a size restriction of 1,000 square feet on attached garages. <br />Our intent was to prevent situations where the attached garage is larger than the home. The <br />Building Official has reported that the new rule is not working. The Building Department has <br />received at least 3 building permits already for larger homes that have garages exceeding !,000 <br />square feet and they do not look odd at all. <br /> <br />In reviewing, the situation, we surveyed other communities and determined the following: East <br />Bethel prohibits attached garages that exceed the footprint of the home. Andover and Elk River <br />do not put a limit on the size of attached garages. Ham Lake has a 2,000 square foot maximum <br />on attached garages. The maximum in Coon Rapids is 1,200 square feet and 1,000 square feet in <br />Blaine. <br /> <br />Restricting the garage size to the size of the house is not recommended by Staff as an alternativ&. <br />There are many large homes with relatively small footprints became of the popularity of 2, 3 and <br />4 level dwellings. Staff also considered going to a percentage of the home size as a restriction in <br />garage size. Part of that consideration included a review of existing situations in Ramsey. We <br />looked at attached garages ranging in size from 1,100 to 1,360 square feet and they represented <br />anywhere from 46% to 76% of the house size. So, garages can be over 1,000 square feet and not <br />necessarily represent a high percentage of the house size. Staff then looked at garages ranging in <br />size from 680 to 916 square feet. Now they were under the 1,000 square foot restriction but <br />represented anywhere from 62% to 86% of the house size. So, garages can be less than 1,000 <br />square feet and represent a relatively high percentage of the house size. <br /> <br />Until May of 1999, there wasn't a restriction on the size of attached garages and there haSn't <br />been a rash of cases where the attached garage exceeds the size of the home. Now, with the new <br />1,000 square foot restriction, City Staffwould have to process many conditional use permits each <br />construction seaSon, and delay construction a minimum of 7 weeks, for garage sizes which <br />further analysis has shown do not look odd or out of place. <br /> <br />At a work session on March 21, the City Council was apprised of the pending building permit <br />applications in conflict with the current 1,000 square foot restriction. ~ The consensus was to <br />process the building permits and take immediate action to amend City Code to go back to the <br />way it was with no restriction on the size of attached garages. <br /> <br />On April 4, the Planning Commission conducted a public .hearing regarding the proposed <br />ordinance to eliminate size restrictions on attached garages. There were no verbal or written <br />comments submitted. <br /> <br /> <br />