My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:42:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 10:33:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> .I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Commissioner Dempsey suggested attempting to resolve the ordinance by only addressing urban <br />subdivision design, and Mr. Boos agreed that the rural and .commercial areas could be addressed <br />at a later date. <br /> <br />Mr. Boos mentioned that the Public Works Committee suggested not taking on maintenance. If a <br />particular subdivision wants maintenance, a maintenance fee should be considered. <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson stated maintenance should not be a part of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dempsey stated that sidewalks should be'for pedestrian <br />use. He also felt the policy should have no variation in construction <br /> <br />ttional <br /> <br />Commissioner Nixt suggested there be a distinction of sidew <br />reached that a sidewalk constitutes a five-foot wide ribbon o <br />eight-foot wide strip of bituminous limited to locations <br />expansion of the existing trail corridor system. <br /> <br /> was <br />a trail ;es an <br />meet the for <br /> <br />Commissioner Nixt summarized the commissiom <br />within the right-of-way; will be required only in <br />with the exceptions of arterial <br />constructed of concrete; will be <br />will require snow removal b He not, <br />. regarding whether to require them <br /> <br />as an <br /> <br /> that will be located <br /> Service Area (MUSA) <br /> i width of five feet; will be <br /> on the utility bill; and. <br /> was still a decision to be made <br />street. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />sidewalks )laced on <br />sidewalks on only of <br />side. <br /> <br /> increase the value of a lot, and whether the <br />sides of the street. It was suggested that placing <br /> facilitate the convenience of plowing to the other <br /> <br />Consensus was to <br />Champlin, Andover, <br />requirements. <br /> <br /> to solicit the cities of Prior Lake, Lakeville, Eagan, Shakopee, <br />Maple Grove, and Elk River to obtain copies of their sidewalk <br /> <br />A committee was formed to review the data received f~om the various cities and to return with <br />recommendations for al1 unresolved issues. Subcommittee members are Chris Dempsey, Steve <br />Ostrum, Mike Kolfe, and Joe Wivoda, with Mike Nixt serving as an alternate. Consensus was to <br />focus only on the MUSA area. The committee will meet on May 11 following the regular Park <br />and Recreation Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Upon inquiry, Mr. Boos advised that MSA dollars are available for trails and trees on MSA <br />streets. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Planning Commission-Park and Recreation Commission/April 18, 2000 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> 17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.