My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:42:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 10:33:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
site plan and they have to consider if the criteria is met for the rezoning. Commissioner 3ohnson <br />agreed with addressing the traffic issue at this time. He questioned the consequences, of cul-de- <br />sating t42~d Avenue. City Engineer JankoWski replied that closing off 142na A'~enue would <br />increase traf~c on Dysprosium Street, Jim Johnson, Hakanson Anderson, stated that he has been <br />a Registered Traffic Engineer for 30 years. In putting together the report it included several <br />assumptions including the improvements on T.H. g47. One of the assumptions he was given <br />would be impending improvements along C.R. gl 16 and one of the considerations was to get full <br />access along C.R. gl t6. Anoka.County is proposing a raised concrete median that would only <br />allow a right-in right out access only. He looked at where people are living in the subdivision <br />and where the trips are c6ming and going from. Eighty percent of the trips are destined to the <br />south and only 20 percent to the north. Such a development is not conducive to attract through <br />traffic, but there'are other measures to reduce that risk. With the improvements of C.R. gl I6 and <br />the intersection of Dysprosium Street and C.R: gl 16 becoming signalized, there should not be an <br />increase in through traffic. He suggested an alternative of cul-de-sacing Argon Street, so the <br />only connection would be Barium Street which does not provide a good short cut. The <br />Commission reviewed the traffic analysis completed by Mr. Johnson, Commissioner. Dempsey <br />stated that one concern with the plan is that there will be a sigrdficant back-up trying to get out <br />onto Dysprosium Street, which will encourage traffic up Argon Street to 142~a and onto T.H. <br />#47. He suggested that staff needs to talk to the County in regards to access onto C.R. #116 and <br />make the County understand that they need a direct access onto C.R ~116. Commissioner <br />Johnson inquired if the access, along C.K #116 could serve the toWnhouse development as well as <br />the apartment complex. Mr. Johnson replied that in his opinion, they would be creating walls to <br />separate the neighborhoods. He stated th.at there needs to be some interchange between the new <br />development and existing development. Commissioner Dempsey stated that he thlnks with some <br />reconfiguration, and incorporating 'some private streets, they could still keep Argon Street <br />Barium Street open and give access to C.R. gl 16.. Commissioner Johnson questioned how they <br />can slow down traffic on Dysprosium Street. City Engineer Jankowski replied that Dysprosium <br />Street is a MSA road and was designed as a collector street. Ms. Huller suggested.making <br />Dysprosium Stregt a dead-end near the water tower and only allowing access to emergency <br />vehicles. Mr. Johnson stated that the best th~ng the City can do is improve T.H. g47, but did not <br />· have a quick maswer for Dysprosium Street. He explained that the City could not dead-end <br />Dysprosium without being required to return State funds that were used to construct the street; <br />but they could' do some type of traffic calming. Commissioner Johnson suggested installing stop <br />signs at 142~a Avenue to slow traffic down. City Engineer Jankowsld'replied that stop signs are <br />only effective for slowing traffic down within 200 feet of the stop sign. Mr..Johnson noted that <br />compliance with a stop sign is 20 p~rcent if they.don't think they are warranted. Commissioner <br />Wivoda inquired if the street were narrowed if it would slow traffic down. Mr. Johnson.replied it <br />would, stating they could place a traffic island at each intersect[on. 'Commissioner 3~ohnson <br />inquired if narrowing the road would involve returning funds. Mr. Johnson replied no. City <br />Engineer Jankowski stated that the desire is to have a minimal amount of accesses onto C.R. <br />g116, but if the access to the development does not work as proposed, then they would have to <br />consider the access onto C.R. glt6. Chairperson Anderson stated that a Iot of issues have been <br />raised at the public hearing he is note prepared to vote on the merits of the case until he has time <br />to review the materials from the public hearing he suggested tabling act[on on the zoning, hold <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />[ <br />I <br /> <br />l~lanning Commission/March 6~ 2000 <br /> Page lfi of 25 <br /> <br />274 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.