My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:42:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 10:33:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
units per acre. Based on that, City Staff recommends denial of the request to consider a <br />moratorium exemption. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if the new Comprehensive Plan under draft is three units per acre and this is <br />for 14.5 units per acre. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that is correct. She stated they are going by the <br />land use designation in the plan of June of 1998 which has since been changed to rural urban <br />transitional. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman reviewed the past discussion about the zoning. <br /> <br />Tom WalIrich, Fafinski, Wallrich & Roos, representing TSM Development, stated they have <br />three concerns. He explained that based on the purchase price from Mr. Johnson, it cannot be <br />economically developed at three units per acre so they would object to a rezoning from industrial <br />to the proposed urban rural transitional zoning. Secondly, they received no notice of the change <br />of designation: He stated they did submit a site plan requesting approval and this is their first <br />request for a moratorium. Mr. Watlrich stated the City has the authority to adopt a moratorium <br />but to adopt it and then extend it in six month increments is 'not authorized by statute. He stated <br />this is an economic problem. Mr. Wallrich stated they purchased the property prior to 1998, it is <br />a small parcel, and the surrounding uses are neither commercial, industrial, nor urban rural <br />transition. Rather, the uses are residential. He stated they are proposing a compatible Use and a <br />nice product on this site. Mr. Wallrich stated the proposed zoning in the Comprehensive Plan <br />leaves them with no economic use and they request approval of the requested exception. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented on the great difference between three units and 14.5 units per acre as <br />being requested. <br /> <br />Mr. Wallrich stated the existing zoning is industrial which is out of character for this location. <br />He stated they request higher density and believe the three units per acre is not reasonable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly commented on the impact of additional traffic to Highway #116 which <br />is akeady heavy. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated the action tonight is concerning only the moratorium exception, <br />not the zoning or amending the Comprehensive Plan considerations. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated there are problems in looking at removing the moratorium in other areas <br />and he believes it will take some time to look at this property. He stated thc general consensus <br />for this site was the lower density. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated he has a copy of the draft November 9, 1998 Plan which <br />shows urban residential transition for this parcel and that is what was identified on the Plan <br />submitted to the Metropolitan Council for their review. <br /> <br />City Council/April 11, 2000 <br /> Page 18 of 26 <br /> <br />307 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.