My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/09/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 05/09/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:43:23 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 10:51:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/09/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />has been properly restored, the surety on the performance and restoration <br />bond posted pursuant to this Subd. 2 shall be released. <br /> <br /> Subd. 3. The Permittee shall perform the work according to the standards <br />and with the materials specified by the City. The City shall have the authority to prescribe the <br />manner and extent of the restoration, and may do so in written procedures of general application <br />or on a case-by-case basis. The City, in exercising this authority, shall be guided but not limited <br />by the following standards and considerations: <br /> <br />The number, size, depth and duration of the excavation, disruptions or <br />damage to the fight-of-way; <br /> <br />bo <br /> <br />The traffic volume carried by the fight-of-way; the character of the <br />neighborhood surrounding the right-of-way; <br /> <br />co <br /> <br />The pre-excavation condition of the fight-of-way; the remaining life- <br />expectancy of the fight-of-way affected by the excavation; <br /> <br />do <br /> <br />Whether the relative cost of the method of restoration to the permittee is in <br />reasonable balance with the prevention of an accelerated depreciation of the <br />right-of-way that would otherwise result from the excavation, disturbance or <br />damage of the right-of-way; and <br /> <br />The likelihood that the particular method of restoration would be effective in <br />slowing the depreciation of the right-of-way that would otherwise take <br />place. <br /> <br /> Subd. 4. By choosing to restore the fight-of-way itself, the permittee <br />guarantees its work and shall maintain it for thirty-six (36) months following its completion. <br />During this thirty-six month period it shall, upon notification from the City, correct all <br />restoration work to the extent necessary, using the method required by the City. Said work shall <br />be completed within twenty-five (25) calendar days of the receipt of the notice from the City, not <br />including days during which work cannot be done because of circumstances constituting force <br />majeure or days when work is prohibited as unseasonable or unreasonable under Section 4.10.16, <br />Subd. 2 ali in the sole determination of the City. <br /> <br /> Subd. 5. If the permittee fails to restore the fight-of-way in the manner and <br />to the condition required by the City, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all repairs <br />required by the City, the City at its option may perform or cause to be performed such work. In <br />that event the permittee shall pay to the City, within thirty (30) days of billing, the cost of <br />restoring the right-of-way. Ifpermittee fails to pay as required, the City may exercise its rights <br />under the performance and restoration bond. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.