My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:45:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 11:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ditches urbanized, these procedures make it impractical for the County to maintain, improve, or <br />repair the ditches. Since the County has no interest in maintaining the ditch system, it is possible <br />for another jurisdiction to assume the responsibility of the ditch. The City has been advised by <br />two attorneys specializing in drainage law, that is should seek transfer of jurisdiction of these <br />ditches from Anoka County. However, state law does not provide for the transfer of jurisdiction <br />to a municipality, but does allow for transfer to a Watershed District or Water Management <br />District. In the case of Ramsey's ditch systems, the appropriate body is the Lower Rum River <br />Watershed Management Organization (LRRWlvlO). The City of Ramsey entered into <br />discussions with the LRRWMO in September 1998, and is now prepared to enter into a joint <br />powers agreement for the transfer of County ditches to the City of Ramsey. The proposed joint <br />powers agreement allows the transfer of the County ditch to the LRRWMO, who then transfers <br />the maintenance to the City of Ramsey. The agreement requires signatures by the City of <br />Ramsey, Anoka County, and the LRRWMO. Staff anticipates that the LRRWMO will formally <br />enter into the agreement on Thursday, June 15, 2000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that, unless the laws change, it seems to be the practical way for <br />the City to deal with the situation, but it does put additional liabilities on the City. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that the City would be exposed to some Iitigation if they did <br />nothing to maintain the ditches and then a property owner claims property damage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly inquired if the City Attorney felt this was the best action to take. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson noted that the City of Ramsey will perform all the maintenance on the <br />ditch, but will not receive the ditch as property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he is concerned that the WMO may become more <br />difficult to work with than Anoka County. <br /> <br />City Attomey Goodrich explained that the WMO will have the legal real estate interest in the <br />ditch, but the City will have the right to do all maintenance work. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly questioned who will determine the standards of the ditch. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich repIied tl~at under this agreement the City of Ramsey would determine <br />the ditch standards. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that he has. seen the process go through the WMO for the past <br />year and have seen all but one member become supportive of the City of Ramsey's interests. He <br />also noted that is a similar agreement between Coon Rapids and Coon Creek Watershed. <br /> <br />City CounciFJune 13, 2000 <br />Page 11 of 26 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.