My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 08/31/2010 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2010
>
Minutes - Council - 08/31/2010 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 1:46:40 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 2:00:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
08/31/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Dehen stated we have three major projects - the bridge over Armstrong, the <br />Flaherty & Collins apartment complex and this rail stop. Are there any priorities set on all three <br />of these — and where will this funding come from. He felt that wherever the funding is decided <br />for, they are all interrelated. <br />Councilmember Wise didn't feel we were talking about three projects — we are talking about two <br />of them. The Flaherty & Collins deal is not something we will be doling out money for. He <br />would agree that the other two are tied up. <br />Planning Manager Miller stated we really do not have our arms around exactly what the costs <br />will be for the Armstrong Interchange. <br />Councilmember Look stated that one of the funding sources for these projects is the Flaherty & <br />Collins project. They will pay taxes immediately and these dollars will go back into this. He <br />expressed some concern about turning this whole area into a TIF District. <br />Councilmember McGlone commented that the Flaherty & Collins project is somewhat <br />contingent on the rail. <br />Mr. Ulrich stated that any other new projects coming in, we hope to catch increments on them to <br />help fund the rail station. The rail station has always been the number one priority. The <br />Armstrong project is a little further out and a lot more expensive. <br />Councilmember Elvig talked about language for a "whereas" pertaining to the VA Clinic being <br />here and that it's imperative there be a rail stop. He inquired if we can add that the Met Council <br />has given us their approval for operational costs and the NCDA gave us approval of their <br />support. He added that he likes that the anticipated total allocation was put in there. <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested adopting the resolution with language added as discussed this <br />evening. <br />Discussion ensued: Alternate 1 or 2 - $3 1 million or look at saying we will match. If we <br />approve $3 1 million, we would have to go to the County Rail Authority and ask them to help <br />fund this $3 1 and we probably improve our chances with a CTIB grant. Maybe we can amend it <br />as we go along. Councilmember Elvig suggested we go in as strong as we can for CTIB — that's <br />the bigger portion of the money. Let's make this happen — put our best foot forward. Mr. Ulrich <br />added that if the project does not get done, we do not spend a thing. <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig and seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey to adopt Resolution <br />#10 -08 -194 dedicating $3.1 million of City of Ramsey funding for the Ramsey Rail station and <br />Authorizing CTIB Grant Application for 2011. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Ramsey, Councilmembers Elvig, Jeffrey, Dehen, Look and <br />Wise. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember McGlone (he had just stepped out of the <br />room). <br />Special City Council / August 31, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.