Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #00-08-_,~LXX <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING <br />PREPAIL~kTION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #00- <br />05 (BITUMINOUS OVERLAY REILLEY ESTATES ADDITION) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined with reference to the <br />bituminous overlay of Reilley Estates Addition, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in <br />the making of such improvement amount to $67,339 so that the total cost of the improvement <br />will be $67,339. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAiYISEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That the portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Ramsey is <br />hereby declared to be $33,669 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited <br />property owners is declared to be $33,670. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />That the principal of the assessments shali be in annual installments extending over a <br />period of ten years; the first of the installments to be payable on or before December 31, <br />2001, and shall bear interest, per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment <br />resolution, at the rate of two (2) percent above the U.S. Treasury Rate. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for <br />such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the distr/ct <br />affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file in the city <br />offices a copy of such proposed assessment for public inspection. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />That the City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such Proposed assessment, <br />notify the Ramsey City Council thereof. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereofi <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />-163- <br /> <br /> <br />