Laserfiche WebLink
-20- <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Board Member Dempsey noted that Jensen should be removed from the vote for approval of the <br />agenda in the July 10, 2000 minutes. <br /> <br />Morion by Board Member Dempsey, seconded' by Board Member Wivoda, to approve the <br />following minutes as amended: <br /> <br />1) Board of Adjustment public hearing regular meeting minutes dated July I0, 2000 <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice-Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Dempsey, Wivoda, <br />Kociscak, Johnson, and Reeve. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS/B OARD BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />Request for a Variance to Rear Yard Setbacks Requirements; Case of <br />Boilermakers #647 <br /> <br />Vice-Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Board of Adjustment meeting at 7:10 <br />p.m. in order to conduct the public hearing. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Vice-Chairperson Nixt called the pubIic hearing to order at 7:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Blackburn stated that Paul Pendergast of Boilermakers # 647 <br />has submit-ted a request for variance to the rear yard setback requirements at 9459 Hwy. #10 NW. <br />Mr. Pendergast is proposing to construct a 2,01 {5 square foot addition onto the existing building. <br />The existing building and 10 feet of the addition encroach on the rear yard setback by a distance <br />of 5 feet. The reason for th. is is that the subject property and the two parcels to the North and <br />East were originally two parceis oriented in a north/south configuration. The West property line <br />was the side property line at that time and the existing building was in compliance with the 10- <br />foot si&yard setback. In 1997, this parcel was replatted into 3 commercial lots with an east/west <br />orientation and Boilermakers occupied Lot 1. When this happened, the West'side of lot 1 then <br />became the rear yard. The North line of lot 1 became the side yard with lot 2. Due to the <br />replatting the setback from the west property line increased fi.om 10 feet to 35 feet and <br />consequently the building became non-conforming because it is located 30 feet fi.om the west <br />property line. City code requires a variance to expand upon a non-conforming structure. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/August 1, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />