My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/08/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2011
>
Minutes - Council - 02/08/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:46:42 PM
Creation date
3/4/2011 9:50:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12) Consider Award of a Contract for Engineering Services to Perform the City's <br />required annual Bridget Inspections and Reporting — This case was brought to the <br />Council at their regular meeting of 1/25/2011. <br />Councilmember Tossey drew attention to item number 8.1, noting that every department in the <br />City came in under budget. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Ramsey, Councilmembers Wise, Jeffrey, Backous, Elvig, <br />McGlone, and Tossey. Voting No: None. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING <br />6.01: Public Hearing to Introduce Ordinance for Sale of City Owned Property in <br />Auditor's Subdivision Number 27; Case of City of Ramsey and Cross of Hope <br />Lutheran Church <br />Mayor Ramsey closed the regular portion of the City Council meeting at 7:26 p.m. in order to <br />conduct a public. hearing. <br />Public Hearing <br />Mayor Ramsey called the public hearing to order at 7:26 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Associate Planner Gladhill reviewed the staff report. <br />Citizen Input <br />Robert Longfield stated the church wanted to come through his property with the road years ago. <br />He is on the south side of the property and asked if that is still under consideration. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill explained the expansion is largely on the parcel to the east. There <br />were comments by the County in the past relating to property on the south side. The City looked <br />at that, and it is dependent if that area would still develop. <br />Mr. Longfield said the City did have meetings with the developer to take his property for that <br />road. He noted if it is still under consideration, he would like to be assured that it will also be <br />considered that his 80 acres would have to have two accesses. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill said if the area to the south develops, there are standards to follow. <br />This could be an option, but there is no active development proposal. <br />Discussion took place regarding a possible second access on the north of the property rather than <br />coming through Mr. Longfield's property. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill suggested the City hold a discussion with the church. <br />City Council / February 8, 2011 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.