My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/15/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2011
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/15/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:00:12 AM
Creation date
3/11/2011 10:17:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
03/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notification: <br />Observations: <br />Due to fact that there are 6 existing metal halide light fixtures that are currently in need of replacement, it has <br />become apparent that something needs to happen. In light of the fact that there is such a large upfront cost of the <br />LED option, Staff is recommending that that option be eliminated from the discussion at this time. As the <br />technology becomes more cost effective there may be a time that it makes sense but that is going to dictated by the <br />market. We also appreciate going through the exercise that is depicted in the life cycle cost analysis spreadsheet. It <br />has made it apparent that something should be done soon to control the annual electric costs. <br />That brings us to the two quotes for replacing the existing metal halide lighting fixtures with fluorescent light <br />fixtures with motion sensors. There was two discrepancies that were mentioned during the February Public Works <br />Committee. The first was the rebates. In discussions with Connexus (who will be available at the meeting to answer <br />questions), there was one correction that needed to be made to the Aid quote. Any motion sensor that controls a <br />bank of lights received a $40 rebate as the Aid proposal indicated but any motion sensor that controls a single light <br />only receives a $5 rebate. That has been corrected in the attached revised proposal. <br />The second discrepancy that was discussed was the number of metal halide fixtures that needed to be replaced in the <br />vehicle storage building. The Aid proposal had 14 and the Ready Watt proposal had 18. There are only 14 metal <br />halide fixtures in the vehicle storage building and therefore the attached Ready Watt proposal was reduced by <br />approximately $1,000 to capture those saving. Additionally, there was 23 motion sensors that were included in the <br />Aid proposal that Ready Watt would include in their not to exceed cost at no charge. <br />Aid Electric Ready Watt <br />Corrected Quotes $16,314 $18,747 <br />Connexus Rebate $ 4,066 $ 4,054 <br />Total Net cost $12,248 $14,681 <br />Funding Source: <br />Public Facilities Fund (the projected balance at the end of 2011 is approximatley $128,000.00 <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the Public Works Committee recommend to City Council approval of the project and <br />approve contracting with AID Electric for the installation of the flourescent option and that the Aid proposal be <br />further modified to require disposal of all fixtures as described in the Vehicle storage building. <br />Committee Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.