My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/22/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 03/22/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:59:17 PM
Creation date
3/21/2011 1:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
materials be totally screened on all four sides. He indicated Mr. Kriens would need to follow the <br />home occupational permit with respect to vehicles. Councilmember Look asked if there were <br />complaints received in the future, could there be a requirement for fencing. Associate Planner <br />Gladhill responded as of now there was not that requirement, but if complaints were received in <br />the future regarding screening, it could come back to Council. Councilmember Elvig stated he <br />does not want to enforce fencing and noted there was a provision to have the area screened. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated because Mr. Kriens had taken responsibility for the illegal dumping and <br />burning, he would be voting to grant this permit. Councilmember Wise stated because Mr. <br />Kriens had not received any neighbor complaints regarding this business, he would be voting in <br />favor of this request. Councilmember Dehen stated he would be voting in favor of this, but he <br />was concerned about outdoor storage and asked the applicant to conceal the outdoor storage as <br />much as possible. <br />Amended Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Ramsey, Councilmembers Elvig, Look, Dehen, <br />and Wise. Voting No: Councilmember McGlone. Absent: Councilmember Jeffrey. <br />Case #4: Request to Consider Evidence of Intent to Continue use of Motor Vehicle <br />Sales Related to Legal Non -Conforming Use Claim at 8110 Highway 10 NW; <br />Case of Chad Lundquist and Eric Lundquist <br />Associate Planner Gladhill reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Dehen asked how long the lease was in existence. <br />Eric Lundquist responded it was from March 2008 to March 2009. He stated the lease required a <br />rental of $700.00 per month. He stated they have had many renters in their location and <br />sometimes they were not paid. <br />Chad Lundquist stated Amazon Auto decided to take on a second location and he did not want to <br />be pressured into changing his lot from one location to another and that was why Amazon Auto <br />signed a new lease at a lower rate. <br />Councilmember Dehen stated he has never seen anyone occupy the building. <br />Chad Lundquist responded there was a person who used that building as storage and repair, but <br />he did not have an active business there. <br />Eric Lundquist stated he was not sure what that person was doing, but he was paying for storage <br />and they needed the rent. <br />Councilmember Elvig believed the landowner's intent was to have cars there and whether or not <br />the tenant brought cars there was not their problem, but the City needed evidence of intent to <br />continue. <br />City Council / November 24, 2009 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.