Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

936 square feet maze, the pnnc~pal bmld~n, ~s ~,600 square feet m s~ze. The total sq,..ua,m footage of the principal building and the accessory building does not exceed the~5i~"i~ coverage restriction. The proposed size of the accessory building does not exceed,~i~'~0% principal building size restriction. The proposed accessory building meets ,alTi~he~,required setbacks. The accessory building is proposed to be £mished with white vin~!i~di~:i;:i~d light brown asphalt shingles. The construction materials are consistent with the:~-res~dentml ~ea,:.it s located in, but deviate from commercial standards and require Council building is not proposed to have an asphalt driveway as this time. require a paved and curbed access to the accessory building. and curbing an entrance road to the proposed building by Planning Commission recommended approval of the prop Staff Review Letter dated August 1, 2000, with year time period to pave the access. The acce§~ City !eed to pavini~` ~!~5~August 2005. The per the proposed ~d a five Motion by Councilmember Connolly, seconded by C'c to approve the proposed accessory building on the Independent Baptist the City Staff Review Letter dated August I, 2000 with construction materials as pro[ a five 7~ar time period to pave the access. Motion ca~ed. Voting Yes: MayOr:Gm~e¢ C~nc~embers Comolly~;:H~d~en, ~derson, Case ~3: Request br Site Plan Re¢[~; CommuniW Devblopment Dkector Frolik st~t~ ~at the Ci~ of R~sey has received a request for site plan, re~:~ ~om g' ii¢ ers ~647: :~ proposes to cons~ct a ~a~ng center addition o~tb::~n existing b~i~ng. ~e site is'}~C~: at 9459 Highway 10 ~, generally no~ of State'~ghway ~10 ~d w~t of 153 AvenUe~:~. ~e site plan w~ submiRed to ~e CiW Council on' August 8, 2000.. ;,,~e,.applic~t:~ not present at ~e meet~g.. ~e Council was concerned w~h~aiyifi~::t~d';~urbin~d;~a::;~'0sSible redevelopment plat for ~at area for ~ose reasons Council ~abl'~' &ction until ~e a~3iicat could be present to ~w~ questions. ~,,~.-;?' C~W Admm~s~ator N0~nstar~-;.~at ~e Council is aware of a developer a~pting to acquke I ?;~?,;:, ~&' ':' . . , ,. :~:;;g~,.,. several of'~ prope~ies ih ~e~'a~ea and the developer h~ been ~ contact wi~ ~e owner of ~e Boile~akers~"prop~,,;b~?~ey have ~dicated ~at they would l~e to proceed with ~e ~%, exp~sion of th~ buildin~ because the developer is unable to proceed wi~ negotiations until ~e ;~.Tt ~ ,¢ .... · (.~...i~;. . "%~(?~,~ feas~b~hty study ~ completed by ~e C~ m reg~ds to the utilities. '"~'(:~'/.:':,Motion by CO~cilmember Co~olly, seconded by Councilmember Hendfi~ea to approve ~e '%~oile~ak~s. site plan contingent upon compli~ce with CiW Staff Review LeRer dated June 28, 2000, with ~odifications as reco~ended by the Plamng Co~ission. .~.7< ;./-~. ;, I I I City Council/August 22, 2000 Page 7 of 18 -105-