Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

sewer pipe in the area. Councilmember Hendriksen disclosed that he had purchased a..garage door from the applicant and inquired if he should abstain from voting. City Attorne~y Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Anderson, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Case #5: Request for Site Plan Review of M & G Leasing;.. ~Q~ ;of Miit°fi~ Glass Community, Development Director Frolik stated that the Ci,tY:i~;f':Rarnsey ~as received a request for site plan review from M & G Leasing. The site plan is;Pr~SPosing to:construct a 7,800 square foot office and trailers sales showroom facility. The ama is generally 16-3~ on the north side of Highway #10, west of Ramsey Boulevard and east of'Arm~0ng Boule_v~i?:;'~e site is zoned Bo 3 Highway Business. office and showroom facilities are p~[ _ed...in-'the 'Highway Business district. The addition includes a 6,000 square foot trailer showroom.area and a 1,800 square foot office faciliW. The structure meets all Highway Business setback .requirements and is in compliance with the 35% lot coverage..restricfion. The site plan prOpOses to~:hage two access points from State Highway #10. MirmeSota Deparrrnent of Transportati~n' has reviewed M & G Leasing's proposed site plan and ~it~ o~n'iy'"oai'fillow,ing one access from" S:t'at'k Highway gl0 at either the east or west end of the property. Ail :'driveWays and off-street ~park/ng areas will be paved and finished with B-612-curbin~" 'Screening is'fi6t'reqfiiredj~because the adjacent parcels area also zoned Highway Business. Thfi~).:facility ~i~t--be se~':'by on-site sewer and water facilities. The proposed double box parkin}g~:!0t .3:i'ghfing fixtur~k~!appear to meet City Code. The Planrfing Commission. zecommended site p~an..-,approval contingent upon compliance with City Staff review lett~ dated July 28, 2000. Councilme/liber Anderson inquired about the iitiib~bnt in the MnDOT letter dated August 11 2000 stat/rig.the following:*gh' addition to thes'~'.'i~'ecific issues we would like to work with the City inb;etter'-"~ana~ng th~'.:~owing accesst3Q.H. #10. Perhaps a more pro-active stance by the City could coi~ki~t of delaying' issuand;'ofbt/ildcg permits until proof is shown that all MnDOT access and draimigepermits have been o¢'{*ained. · ,.,.-,·~:?' Commum. ty Development DireCtor Frolik replied that staff recently began including the v-~ ~.' requiremen!~'/.n the Developmen ' City Adminis~aDr Norman stated that the City has its own study of the corridor under way as well as a .joint stu~l~ y with several cities which will probably include that the City spend money to construct a frontage road and suggested that the Council consider language that at the time the '""~,.i'!'.' frontage road:isi~onstructed the applicant would ~ve up the access to Highway gl0 at no cost to CotmCflmember Zimmerman replied that the City cannot take away the hght of the property O WB~grl'. -t08- City Council/August 22, 2000 Page 10 of 18