Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to direct. . <br />schedule a pubhc hearing for the adopUon of a C~ty ordinance amendm, the C~ty j¢~a~er tO:;!¢:~i: <br />reflect the separation of the positions of the Cky Clerk and City Administrator and es i'i}hing a'%? <br />City Clerk position, after ~ving notice as require by law. <br /> <br />Motion can/ed. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />:rson, <br /> <br />Case #9: Adopt Sidewalk Ordinance <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that <br />introduced an ordinance establishing a requirement <br />The purpose of the ordinance is to assist <br />subdivisions until all of Subdivision 9 of City Code car <br />Comprehensive Plan. This ordinance is consistent with the <br />Met Council, and addresses at least one of the goals in the <br />connections to community facilities. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember An~S0n, <br />Ordinance # establishing.a}e%ir~ent for ~i~Ci~-Stin new <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Re~b~ding <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson: aye <br />Councilmember COnnolty:;~ .(· aye ~::i?~ <br />Councilmembe; 'Hendrikse~ ":'aYe ';'~}}~, <br />Councilmexnb& Zimmerman fi.ye <br /> <br />27,,~000, the City Council <br /> m development. <br /> residential <br /> an approved <br /> Plan submitted to the <br /> pedestrian <br /> <br /> y, to adopt <br />~ment. <br /> <br /> ~-..::i ,,: ? k, ';,: <br /> Case #.10:'; AwardCon~act'for .Wel~ouse No. ~ 3 Gmprovement Project <br /> <br />Ci, En~ne~. Olson st~ed;~hat at ~e Au~st 8, 2000 Ci, Council meeting, ~e Ci, Council <br />had question~";~}ard~g'i~'}ues for the installation of a gen~ator in Wellhouse No. 3. ~ese <br />~ssues ~ncluded: :~ual maintenance costs, rehabd~ of natural g~ generators, ~d advantages <br />of natural gas'generators. ~e C~ has received a leaer ~om Bolton & Me~ reg~d~g ~ese <br />"::;:~?]~.issues. ~ a~ual maintenance costs asociated wi~ a generator ~e ~ticipated at <br />"~x approximately $950 per ye~. ~s would be a cost ~at would be required for ~o overhauls per <br />~e~ .~d:.~ese overhauls should be handled by an ~dividual qualified for such work. Natural <br />gasgen&ators have a ve~ good track record associated with loss of se~ice. Relict Ener~ w~ <br />conm~ted regarding the possibility of loss of natural gas se~ice during periods of elec~cal <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Council/August 22, 2000 <br /> Page 15 of 18 <br /> <br />-113- <br /> <br /> <br />