Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I '1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I0. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. That the surrounding adjacent properties to the west, north and east and the property on the south side of 15Ya Avenue N.W. are also zoned R-1 Rural Residential and are aisc in the MUSA. That the surrounding properties were developed prior to being included in the MUSA at rural residential standards with one acre and larger lot sizes. That Section 9.20.03 of the Ramsey City Code states that the intent of the R-1 Rural Residential District is to accommodate single-family dwelling units on land outside the Urban Service Area. That Section 9.20.03 of the Ramsey City Code states that the intent of the R-1 Urban Residential District is to accommodate single-family dwelling units on land inside the Urban Service Area. That the Subject Property was included in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area by a Comprehensive Plan amendment approved by the Ramsey City Council on November 9, 1993 (Resolution #93~11-268) and the Metropolitan Council on January 12, 1995. That the proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. That the Applicant has provided the City with a concept or general development plan dated received by the City on May 15, 2000, reflecting the Applicant's intent to develop the Subject Property with single family residential lots that will be served by sanitary sewer and municipal water, but said plan is not in conformance with the City's current performance standards for single family urban development. That the proposed zoning amendment will not substantially adversely impair the use or market valud of any surrounding property. That the proposed zoning amendment will not change the essential character of the area, which is residential. That the intersection of 153ra Avenue N.W. and T.H. #47 is being significantly improved by signalization and channelization and as improved, the Highway 47 corridor is capable of accommodating, in a safe manner, the additional traffic to be generated by the rezoned property. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: RESOLUTION #00-07- Page 2 of 3 -197-